Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[Dougals Dad]

59 mins: It is 2-1 as Danylyk hammers home from 25 yards

Back in it folks!

[Bath Alty]

lets hope the turn around in mood keep going for 10 minutes too!

[OldhamAlty]

GET IN!

[Nonleaguer]

In the words of Alan Partridge "Back of the net!!!"

[Dougals Dad]

In the words of Alan Partridge "Back of the net!!!"

"Shiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiit!"

[Mick]

Orange Tree trip put on-hold for 25 mins !
Saves me £2.35 and 210 calories tonight

[VofD]

Game over now

Really hope I was wrong. C'mon ALTY, replay at least.

[radcliffe alty]

"He must have a foot like a traction engine!"

[JackSwindells No 1 Fan]

we're putting them under pressure

[Dougals Dad]

66 mins: Alty going for it as Clee makes a difference

[AltyTunnelSteward]

HT: 1-0 but AFC fortunate both to be ahead and to have eleven men on pitch after keeper took out Senior 40 yards from goal but was not dismissed presumably because a defender had got back but arguably the offence itself merits a straight red.


Always struggled with this.  If a keeper takes out a forward surely there have to be two defenders behind him to avoid the straight red.  If you are the last defender there is usually still a keeper to beat but it's still red.  So the keeper has one defender behind him that just replaces the keeper and off he goes...no?

   It's not necessarily about the number of players, in this case behind the keeper. The ajudication to be made is whether the challenge prevented an obvious goalscoring opportunity i.e. Is the player more likely to score than not. This does not preclude a red card for the challenge if it's considered serious enough on it's own merits

[VofD]

HT: 1-0 but AFC fortunate both to be ahead and to have eleven men on pitch after keeper took out Senior 40 yards from goal but was not dismissed presumably because a defender had got back but arguably the offence itself merits a straight red.


Always struggled with this.  If a keeper takes out a forward surely there have to be two defenders behind him to avoid the straight red.  If you are the last defender there is usually still a keeper to beat but it's still red.  So the keeper has one defender behind him that just replaces the keeper and off he goes...no?

   It's not necessarily about the number of players, in this case behind the keeper. The ajudication to be made is whether the challenge prevented an obvious goalscoring opportunity i.e. Is the player more likely to score than not. This does not preclude a red card for the challenge if it's considered serious enough on it's own merits

FFS


F

[Dougals Dad]

2108: Goalflash Notts County 2-1 Forest Green (Hughes)

2107: Goalflash Notts County 1-1 Forest Green (Rankin)

[Nonleaguer]

AFC Wimbledon 3 Alty 1.

[Dougals Dad]

Bum botty fart farts