Yep, covering the pitch will be expensive. But how many games would it save being postponed. What is the expected reduction of support for the re-arranged games?? times that by the life of the covers would easily be more profitable for their use.
I agree that the cost is expensive, but should be looked at in other ways. Perhaps man u could pay part of it, it may be a non-starter, but at least needs a good examination of the possibilities.
Take for example our two big home games, York for example have just played stoke in a more expensive FA cup clash, and less support is expected to travel on Tuesday. Added to over-spending at Christmas, then we are looking at 5-600 less. Add this to Wrexham, who again may bring significantly less for a midweek game. Then overall we could be looking at 9-1000 less people coming through the turnstiles. A guessitmate would put the loss of revenue approaching 9-10,000. This is just two games in one season. Obviously some games will succumb to the pitfalls of bad weather even if precautions are taken. However in this day and age, we need to maximise all our revenues at all times. Even if this means investing in protecting our main asset, the hallowed turf of moss lane.
As for later kick offs, the problem there is that the pitch would start to freeze during the game. a 5.15 match would not finish till gone 8, with the temperature slowly freezing the pitch.