Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[AltyFan101]

No issue in giving younger players such as Hancock, Mullarkey, Mooney and Hulme two year deals because they are only going to improve further over the next couple of years.  Only risk is giving the older players such as Richman, Moult and Densmore two year contracts because they may turn out to be not good enough for the National League and at that age it is unlikely they have enough time to get up to the level required.  But, saying that, I agree as has already been said, all of those players have been at the club for years and years and years and you'd hope that if it was clear they were not good enough or weren't needed anymore they would take one for the club and leave without putting the club under too much financial strain in paying out their contracts.

Densmore will be 32 in November.

Moult's 31st birthday occurred last January.

Richman turned 30 in June.

Hancock will be 30 in early September and Hulme's 30th birthday falls in November.

 

My bad, very surprised Hancock is that old tbh 🤣🤣

[Brian Flynn]

I was 70 on Friday and Mrs S hasn't given me a two year contract yet! I think I'm on non-contract terms 😉

Rolling weekly contract for Saughall Robin.

[Saughall Robin]

I was 70 on Friday and Mrs S hasn't given me a two year contract yet! I think I'm on non-contract terms 😉

Rolling weekly contract for Saughall Robin.

From one Brian to another, I'll take it! 😂 😂