Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[Jimmy]

With the squad being so small why is there room for both mitchley and Brooke no need for both

[markecky]

Thought Mitchley did well when he came on today, looked strong and brought something different.

IMO Brooke is not good enough.

[ASMO]

Agree with you ecky Brooke not good enough think Mich has potential , need s more games to prove himself

[Paul Cain's Chip Pan]

If this is the case, there is absolutely no room in this squad for passengers and Brooke should be replaced as soon as possible.

[Jimmy]

It's in the case of in an ideal world get rid of both replace with a better forward and another defender or midfielder

[robininstockport]

We've got Mitchey and Brooke in case Reeves leaves.

Mitchley might well do a job

[Jimmy]

Mitchley for reeves who will athletico Madrid replace falcao with when he leaves heskey

[ForeverAlty]

I thought Mitchelly looked rather sluggish and seemed to loose out on the ball to often.

Brooke never does anything when he is on the ball, he needs a personal lesson with Larwie and Clee because it seems when they get the ball they make something out of nothing.

[Jimmy]

Brooke and mitchley were brought in because the manager panicked in the summer when he thought reeves was leaving

[fuertes]

Brooke and mitchley were brought in because the manager panicked in the summer when he thought reeves was leaving

Who do you think he should have brought in? It looked for all the world as if Reeves was leaving. And McGivern f**ked off too. So he needed a couple of forwards. Young lads with a bit of experience at higher levels seemed reasonable enough acquisitions to most people...

[markecky]

Mitchley is tarred with coming in on the same day as Brooke, people see them as a double act. 

Mitchley needs match fitness for sure but he can't get that unless he gets a run.

I believe when his chance comes he will be a good signing for us.

[Jimmy]

Brooke and mitchley were brought in because the manager panicked in the summer when he thought reeves was leaving

Who do you think he should have brought in? It looked for all the world as if Reeves was leaving. And McGivern f**ked off too. So he needed a couple of forwards. Young lads with a bit of experience at higher levels seemed reasonable enough acquisitions to most people...
[/quote

They were brought very early lee in my opinion was hasty and there track records were hardly impressive

[Mick]

As others have said, at the time they were recruited, it was a racing certainty that Damian Reeves was on his way........in fact he had left us. They both seemed reasonable signings at the time given the clubs budget. Of course I would have much preferred we signed Barnes-Homer 

I have only seen both players for a limited amount of time and Mitchley looks keen to impress and I think needs match time. I am sure we will see some ins and outs at the club over Christmas once the FA income is known and we know how the Trophy is going

[fuertes]

But Jimmy, in previous years everyone has absolutely hammered the manager for leaving his signings too late, thus starting the season underprepared.

Damned if you do and damned if you don't. It's not even Christmas in these players' first season. I think we owe them a bit longer...

[RocketDan]

I must say I am disappointed with the progress of Ryan Brooke.

speaking to a few Oldham fans over the summer, they were surprised he dropped so far down the pyramid and thought he could do a job in the football league.