www.altyfans.co.uk

Especially in such a poor league. I have never been a fan of Lee from the start, he has never sat well with me !!!

*mould

Cant keep blaming  Perry , i said after Saturday we cant play that formation , just to fit Higgingbotham , Nicky wasted in mid ,how the f**k can we have so many defenders and not be able to defend .

    like I said NOT his fault but not fit enough and walshaw will constantly chase down and brings a lot more to the team. I blame Sinnott and his sh*te tactics,  always have done!

I said to my friend I was excited about Higgy signing but worried how sinnott will change it to accommodate him and it's proving me right again.  Not known many top professionals stand out when dropping divisions to see out their career. Firstly revert back to 4-4-2 now walshaw is injured. I am fuming tonight

He is one of the worst managers we've had for tactics!  He has the squad but the clown has gone with the formation that clearly nearly costed us on Sat. Perry ain't good enough, Clee central is a waste and ineffective,  we don't play on the ground without wide men, we need dens right back, I'd play higgy defensive cent mid but if we feel we must play him then centre back with havern but I think leather deserves his place in defence as centre back. No crosses without wide men, which means hoof up to Perry!  Sinnott frustrates me soooooooo much arghhhh probably come back now!

Well done lads for fighting until the end to collect the 3 points !!

I am all for a change in formation but it was clear after only 10 mins today that 5-3-2 was not working. Griffin was up against an excellent right winger in there number 7 and had no cover at all, as our midfielders were very central. We needed width today and would have been better off playing 4-4-2 against a well organised Lemington team. Clee can not play centre mid, the game bypasses him and then he will try a turn which he would get away with on the wing and turns into trouble. Even reverting back to 4-4-2 for the last 8 mins made a difference but that should have been changed after the first 20 mins.

Perry did OK, not sure it was a man of the match performance, however we need to start Walshaw and Reeves.  There are times when Perry holds it up but today it was pointless as we had no width so we reverted back to the long punt up field. It was scrappy and the wrong tactics . The thing with playing Perry and this is NOT his fault is we become scrappy. We don’t get it on the floor, we are a much better team when the ball is on the floor. For me Walshaw and Reeves can easily play together, not a believer that strikers can’t play with each other. If it’s a case that Walshaw and Reeves become a bit more greedy playing together then I would rather have that, because I guarantee we would score more goals with those two. Walshaw brings you energy, he’s strong, good with his head and he continually chases down which Perry doesn’t do, which means teams move up the pitch more easier and quicker against us. At times today the full backs had no-one to pass to so just kicked very high in the air.

If we play 3 at the back this would be my team :-

                  Coburn

      RCB   Havern         LCB Higginbotham   
                CB Leather
RWB Densmore                     LWB Griffin   
         CM Richman        CM Moult             

      RCF Walshaw            LCF Clee
                CF Reeves         

Any sense and if he still has the legs which I am sure he has at this rubbish level then in front of the back 4 like Boshell,alongside moult which will allow moult to go furtherf forward which is his best position and richman out wide! Moult is capable of scoring a few! Really would like to see reeves and walshaw back together!