www.altyfans.co.uk

General Category => Altrincham FC First Team => Topic started by: Mrs Warbouys on September 19, 2014, 09:51:28 AM

Title: Barnet Match
Post by: Mrs Warbouys on September 19, 2014, 09:51:28 AM
Barnet 2-2 Altrincham
                  Reeves 2

.......................Parton
Leather....Havern....Marshell.....Griffin

Wilkinson......Moult....Cavannah...Clee
..................Reeves....Perry
Title: Re: Barnet Match
Post by: Timperley The Best on September 19, 2014, 10:06:01 AM
Is lawrie injured ?if not would have him over wilko
Title: Re: Barnet Match
Post by: markecky on September 19, 2014, 10:15:07 AM
Lawrie for Wilkinson and that's really the only team we have available, unless Dens make a sharp recovery.

Not going to predict but I'm just hoping that they are spending so much time trying to hammer us that they leave gaps that we can exploit.

Reevsie had a very quiet game on Tuesday and he doesn't often have two of those in a row and he has a point to prove to Martin Allen.  Got to take our chances when they come.
Title: Re: Barnet Match
Post by: Mrs Warbouys on September 19, 2014, 10:25:34 AM
Id give wilkinson a go, he's right sided, and its clearly not lawries best position
Title: Re: Barnet Match
Post by: eightiesrobin on September 19, 2014, 10:54:33 AM
Wilko hasn't started a league game since 4th February by my reckoning. Why not start with Gillespie?
Title: Re: Barnet Match
Post by: ManagementGuru on September 19, 2014, 11:21:48 AM
Wilkinson struggles to tackle back - as i recall from Gloucester away last season
Title: Re: Barnet Match
Post by: robininstockport on September 19, 2014, 12:20:51 PM
                    Patron

      Leather Havern Marshall Griffin

Lawrie Richman Cavanagh Williams Clee

                           Perry


if Richman is suspened then Wilkinson




To be honest I'm dreading this
Title: Re: Barnet Match
Post by: Mrs Warbouys on September 19, 2014, 12:53:31 PM
Richman is suspended, they are instant in this league, we have nothing to fear and just need to get at them and be clinical when we create chances.The pressure wil be on them
Title: Re: Barnet Match
Post by: eightiesrobin on September 19, 2014, 02:29:51 PM
                   Patron

      Leather Havern Marshall Griffin

Lawrie Richman Cavanagh Williams Clee

                           Perry


if Richman is suspened then Wilkinson




To be honest I'm dreading this

You'd leave out Reeves AND Gillespie? And play "one goal in 55 premier games" KP as a lone striker? No wonder you're dreading it....

Williams is out according to the main site, BTW
Title: Re: Barnet Match
Post by: eightiesrobin on September 19, 2014, 02:32:09 PM
Richman is suspended, they are instant in this league, we have nothing to fear and just need to get at them and be clinical when we create chances.The pressure wil be on them

You're hoping for the "banana skin" effect then  ;D
Title: Re: Barnet Match
Post by: Jimmy on September 19, 2014, 03:19:25 PM
Barnet 2-2 Altrincham
                  Reeves 2

.......................Parton
Leather....Havern....Marshell.....Griffin

Wilkinson......Moult....Cavannah...Clee
..................Reeves....Perry
I wish we were as good as your predictions pete
Title: Re: Barnet Match
Post by: Jimmy on September 19, 2014, 03:20:39 PM
Wilkinson struggles to tackle back - as i recall from Gloucester away last season
As does lawrie
Title: Re: Barnet Match
Post by: robininstockport on September 19, 2014, 04:36:53 PM


You'd leave out Reeves AND Gillespie? And play "one goal in 55 premier games" KP as a lone striker? No wonder you're dreading it....


90 minuets of damage limitation
Title: Re: Barnet Match
Post by: distancetraveller on September 19, 2014, 05:20:19 PM
I would really like to see leather back in the centre of defence where he won player of the year last season.

I feel he can react quicker than most and hopefully stop us giving away soft goals

Who at right back ????   I would stick Mault there until Dens is back
Title: Re: Barnet Match
Post by: robininstockport on September 19, 2014, 05:22:38 PM
I would really like to see leather back in the centre of defence where he won player of the year last season.

I feel he can react quicker than most and hopefully stop us giving away soft goals

Who at right back ????   I would stick Mault there until Dens is back

I agree about Moult at RB but who would you partner Leather with?
Title: Re: Barnet Match
Post by: TheCultOfIanTunnacliffe on September 19, 2014, 05:29:14 PM


You'd leave out Reeves AND Gillespie? And play "one goal in 55 premier games" KP as a lone striker? No wonder you're dreading it....


90 minuets of damage limitation



I'm not sure that getting Perry to undertake a host of 17th Century stately court dances would prove to be an effective weapon against the anticipated Barnet onslaught.


Title: Re: Barnet Match
Post by: distancetraveller on September 19, 2014, 06:52:04 PM
I would really like to see leather back in the centre of defence where he won player of the year last season.

I feel he can react quicker than most and hopefully stop us giving away soft goals

Who at right back ????   I would stick Mault there until Dens is back

I agree about Moult at RB but who would you partner Leather with?
Haven they are a tried and tested pair. No axe to grind with Tom. Just think Scott and Luca are the solution.
Title: Re: Barnet Match
Post by: Alty_22 on September 19, 2014, 07:00:33 PM


.......................coburn
Leather....Havern....Marshell.....Griffin

Wilkinson......Moult....Cavannah...Clee
..................Reeves....Perry
Title: Re: Barnet Match
Post by: Ballers on September 19, 2014, 09:38:30 PM
I would really like to see leather back in the centre of defence where he won player of the year last season.

I feel he can react quicker than most and hopefully stop us giving away soft goals

Who at right back ????   I would stick Mault there until Dens is back

I agree about Moult at RB but who would you partner Leather with?
Haven they are a tried and tested pair. No axe to grind with Tom. Just think Scott and Luca are the solution.

As I said a month ago, I'll be annoyed if we piss around for 2/3 months before coming round to this inevitable conclusion.
Title: Re: Barnet Match
Post by: Ballers on September 19, 2014, 09:39:20 PM
Wilko hasn't started a league game since 4th February by my reckoning. Why not start with Gillespie?

In which case, why was he retained for a season in a league a division higher (bar the obvious)?
Title: Re: Barnet Match
Post by: taxi Phil on September 19, 2014, 11:42:03 PM
                                                                          Parton
Leather                Havern                                Marshall                          M.Williams                        Griffin
                             Moult                                Cavanagh                           Clee
                                                             Perry                   Reeves

Subs : Coburn, Wilkinson, Lawrie, King, Gillespie

And yes, after watching our car crash on Tuesday, I'd park BOTH buses.     

                           
Title: Re: Barnet Match
Post by: eightiesrobin on September 20, 2014, 09:36:18 AM
Wilko hasn't started a league game since 4th February by my reckoning. Why not start with Gillespie?

In which case, why was he retained for a season in a league a division higher (bar the obvious)?

Quite. I think all contracts were offered and accepted while everyone was still pissed after the playoff win.
Title: Re: Barnet Match
Post by: Jimmy on September 21, 2014, 02:19:26 AM
Wilko hasn't started a league game since 4th February by my reckoning. Why not start with Gillespie?

In which case, why was he retained for a season in a league a division higher (bar the obvious)?

Quite. I think all contracts were offered and accepted while everyone was still pissed after the playoff win.
A comment in jest but indirectly fairly true many players who simply shouldev gone in the summer
Title: Re: Barnet Match
Post by: robininstockport on September 21, 2014, 10:12:46 AM
Didn't go yesterday so  I assumed that when Densmore came on for Clee we went 5 at the back, but having read the match report it appears that we kept to 4-4-2 with Griffin Lw and Leather at LB.

This seems abit odd to say the least unless Clee was injured?