www.altyfans.co.uk

General Category => Altrincham FC First Team => Topic started by: Cornerflag on February 26, 2011, 02:16:14 PM

Title: AFCW match thread
Post by: Cornerflag on February 26, 2011, 02:16:14 PM
TEAM:Dootson, Smith, Williams, Joseph,Young, Piergianni, Connors, Lawton, Clee, Baynes, Reeves Subs:Coburn, Brown, Danylyk,Twiss, Beesley
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: wayno on February 26, 2011, 02:16:57 PM
Any radio links today?
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: Narcissist on February 26, 2011, 02:18:19 PM
COME ON ALTY!!!!!!!!
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: Cornerflag on February 26, 2011, 02:19:29 PM
Any radio links today?


I am hoping this will work

http://www.wdon.com/
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: hsmith1 on February 26, 2011, 02:21:44 PM
from JL
ALTRINCHAM (Red & white stripes, black shorts, red socks): From - 30. Craig DOOTSON, 5. Robbie WILLIAMS, 4. Marc JOSEPH, 26. Carl PIERGIANNNI, 2. James SMITH, 7. Robbie LAWTON (capt), 18. Steven CONNORS, 28. Sam WEDGBURY, 8. Damian REEVES, 11. Nicky CLEE, 19. Mark BEESLEY, Subs: 1. Stuart COBURN, 17. Wes BAYNES, 16. Anthony DANYLYK, 15. Ryan BROWN, 9. Michael TWISS, 20. Sam HEWSON

 thought Wedgbury had gone back?
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: chris888 on February 26, 2011, 02:22:20 PM
hmm, odd how wedgbury is strting and he is at macc :P
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: wayno on February 26, 2011, 02:23:40 PM
Any radio links today?


I am hoping this will work

http://www.wdon.com/

thanks
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: markecky on February 26, 2011, 02:24:33 PM
He has obviously updated the AFC team and is about to do the Alty one..the team is in the first post I would guess.
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: markecky on February 26, 2011, 02:26:23 PM
After listening to that commentary against them in the FA Trophy I couldnt stand it again. Will follow on here..
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: chris888 on February 26, 2011, 02:28:03 PM
lovely choice of music on the radio as well :P
hopefully play well like we did against york and maybe nick a point, come on alty..
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: Toff Apple on February 26, 2011, 02:36:27 PM
I quite like their virtual stadium doodar though.
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: robininstockport on February 26, 2011, 02:40:36 PM
Does this mean Smith will playing at right wing back?
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: 62vintage on February 26, 2011, 02:58:51 PM
Are we playing 5 at the back? I hope not.
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: Narcissist on February 26, 2011, 03:00:03 PM
Anyone got any ideas for the formation??
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: robininstockport on February 26, 2011, 03:01:55 PM
Anyone got any ideas for the formation??


Dootson's in nets and Reeves up front. After that no idea (Clee will be on the left)
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: gazwarrington on February 26, 2011, 03:03:50 PM
I hope the dons "Mash it up" ... I can see these commentators annoying me...


YES ... "All due respect we should be winning against teams like these" .. Excellent..
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: chris888 on February 26, 2011, 03:05:06 PM
                                           30. Craig DOOTSON,
                       5. Robbie WILLIAMS, 4. Marc JOSEPH, I, 22. Greg YOUNG,
2. James SMITH,                                                                                              26. Carl PIERGIANNN
                       7. Robbie LAWTON (capt), 18. Steven CONNORS,
 17. Wes BAYNES,                                                                     11. Nicky CLEE
                                               8. Damian REEVES,

i am thinking this maybe?
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: markecky on February 26, 2011, 03:05:56 PM
Barrow one down!
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: 62vintage on February 26, 2011, 03:06:17 PM
Crawley 1 up v Barow
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: robininstockport on February 26, 2011, 03:06:44 PM
Swap Young and Joseph
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: gazwarrington on February 26, 2011, 03:07:16 PM
Wonder if Barrow ever get bored of starting brilliantly and then free falling every season. ;D
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: chris888 on February 26, 2011, 03:08:05 PM
ive never heard piergianni's name pronounced like that :P
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: robininstockport on February 26, 2011, 03:08:08 PM
Was talking to a Barrow fan today, he said they were shocking last Tuesday and can't see any hope.

Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: hsmith1 on February 26, 2011, 03:09:13 PM
these two are not very good so far
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: robininstockport on February 26, 2011, 03:09:43 PM
Marna has scored again.
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: markecky on February 26, 2011, 03:10:00 PM
Kett 2 Newport 0 is good for us..Newport are slding towards the end of the season..and we have to play them twice
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: hsmith1 on February 26, 2011, 03:10:25 PM
from Jl
10 Alty shading it but no sign of a goal yet
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: D.A. ALTY on February 26, 2011, 03:11:21 PM
Any radio links today?
WHO R YA,WHO R YA
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: B. 4D on February 26, 2011, 03:11:31 PM
It just took the commentators 5mins to say,
'we should be beating teams like Altrincham'
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: robininstockport on February 26, 2011, 03:11:46 PM
Have York finished thier warm up routine yet?
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: 62vintage on February 26, 2011, 03:12:49 PM
Our goalie sounds like a cowboy YEEEEEEEEHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: 62vintage on February 26, 2011, 03:14:45 PM
Are these 2 commentators at the game? Hardly any backgroung noise
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: JackSwindells No 1 Fan on February 26, 2011, 03:15:43 PM
South Notts signing from deepest Devon.. Frogmore!
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: thegazelle on February 26, 2011, 03:16:13 PM
come on alty come on alty
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: B. 4D on February 26, 2011, 03:16:50 PM
They are at the game
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: thegazelle on February 26, 2011, 03:19:35 PM
well feck me commentary chrystal clear in the indian jungle
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: 62vintage on February 26, 2011, 03:20:52 PM
Barrow equalise
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: markecky on February 26, 2011, 03:23:32 PM
Hayes one down
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: B. 4D on February 26, 2011, 03:23:52 PM
Any elephants today Pete?
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: JackSwindells No 1 Fan on February 26, 2011, 03:24:13 PM
Gazelle, get in the stadium!
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: gazwarrington on February 26, 2011, 03:25:02 PM
COME ON ALTY !!!
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: GolfRoader on February 26, 2011, 03:26:22 PM
sounds like we're doing ok at the moment, very solid
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: markecky on February 26, 2011, 03:26:31 PM
FGR winning but I expected that..we will beat Tamworth at home
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: 62vintage on February 26, 2011, 03:28:41 PM
York 1-0 away at Hayes
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: markecky on February 26, 2011, 03:29:04 PM
BArrow 2-1 down - will end 5-1
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: 62vintage on February 26, 2011, 03:29:57 PM
Brodie just scored a penalty for Crawley
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: robininstockport on February 26, 2011, 03:30:23 PM
Can see Crawley ripping Barrow a new one.

Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: markecky on February 26, 2011, 03:34:38 PM
Southport one down..get in
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: robininstockport on February 26, 2011, 03:34:47 PM
Bath 1 up with Scouseport
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: gazwarrington on February 26, 2011, 03:35:08 PM
Keep it going Alty ....
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: robininstockport on February 26, 2011, 03:35:42 PM
Bath 1 up with Scouseport


It was a C Lever og!
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: robininstockport on February 26, 2011, 03:37:19 PM
Young booked for unsporting behaviour
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: hsmith1 on February 26, 2011, 03:37:42 PM
blast 1-0
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: B. 4D on February 26, 2011, 03:38:06 PM
sh*t
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: markecky on February 26, 2011, 03:38:20 PM
Damn..it was important to get to half time..
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: B. 4D on February 26, 2011, 03:39:39 PM
Come on lads, you were doing so well
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: VofD on February 26, 2011, 03:39:57 PM
We are still in it.Cmon Alty.
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: 62vintage on February 26, 2011, 03:40:03 PM
Almost straight after we miss a good chance.
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: markecky on February 26, 2011, 03:43:28 PM
Can Crawley play properly please...Barrow 2-2
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: robininstockport on February 26, 2011, 03:45:08 PM
Carl P. booked
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: hsmith1 on February 26, 2011, 03:45:27 PM
2-0 now
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: markecky on February 26, 2011, 03:46:02 PM
Thats a terrible few mins for us!
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: 62vintage on February 26, 2011, 03:46:21 PM
With the team we have put out that is game over.
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: RageAgainstTheFirstTeam on February 26, 2011, 03:46:50 PM
Game over, not worried though.
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: B. 4D on February 26, 2011, 03:46:58 PM
Long way back now :(
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: VofD on February 26, 2011, 03:47:13 PM
Game over :( :( :(  Just hope other results go our way.
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: 62vintage on February 26, 2011, 03:48:02 PM
Start the second half with Twiss and Beesley on to have any chance.
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: TheCultOfIanTunnacliffe on February 26, 2011, 03:48:26 PM
Oh well.....it's yet another afternoon of having to pray that results elsewhere are favourable.

Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: Nonleaguer on February 26, 2011, 03:49:48 PM
JL "Alty allow Yuseff to run"  Why?? Where's the defensive side of our team?
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: B. 4D on February 26, 2011, 03:51:27 PM
Needs a good team talk of Kenny
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: markecky on February 26, 2011, 03:53:48 PM
Start the second half with Twiss and Beesley on to have any chance.

I'd rather put my mother on than the passenger that is Beesley.
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: 62vintage on February 26, 2011, 03:54:28 PM
JL "Alty allow Yuseff to run"  Why?? Where's the defensive side of our team?

If you include the goalie we have 6 defenders in the side today. Although to be honest when we lose the ball all 11 should be defending.
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: taxi Phil on February 26, 2011, 03:56:37 PM
Start the second half with Twiss and Beesley on to have any chance.

I'd rather put my mother on than the passenger that is Beesley.
We could register her, assuming she's unattached  :D
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: Uncle Globnasty on February 26, 2011, 03:57:24 PM
Didn't realistically expect anything from today (although you always hope). Far more important fixtures to come.
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: markecky on February 26, 2011, 03:57:42 PM
My pal at the game says "Nothing in the game until they scored the 1st that was a mile offside"

That what happens when you are up there.

Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: markecky on February 26, 2011, 03:59:43 PM
Start the second half with Twiss and Beesley on to have any chance.

I'd rather put my mother on than the passenger that is Beesley.
We could register her, assuming she's unattached  :D

She hasn't played since a kickabout with me on Llandudno beach with a flyaway in 1983...she hasnt signed Conference forms for anyone and would probably play "if it cheered me up a bit"
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: hsmith1 on February 26, 2011, 04:00:28 PM
i did not think we would get anything,but i always hope
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: Nonleaguer on February 26, 2011, 04:02:07 PM
The first may have been offside but that does not explain the lack of any meaningful challenge on somehow advancing with the ball on goal as was the case for the second. The goals against column in the table says it all.
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: Uncle Globnasty on February 26, 2011, 04:04:31 PM
Smack the dons up...
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: markecky on February 26, 2011, 04:04:43 PM
The first may have been offside but that does not explain the lack of any meaningful challenge on somehow advancing with the ball on goal as was the case for the second. The goals against column in the table says it all.

Are you there?
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: TheCultOfIanTunnacliffe on February 26, 2011, 04:04:54 PM
Start the second half with Twiss and Beesley on to have any chance.

I'd rather put my mother on than the passenger that is Beesley.
We could register her, assuming she's unattached  :D

She hasn't played since a kickabout with me on Llandudno beach with a flyaway in 1983...she hasnt signed Conference forms for anyone and would probably play "if it cheered me up a bit"

Does that mean we would need to get international clearance for her then?

Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: Nonleaguer on February 26, 2011, 04:06:23 PM
No I'm listening to live commentary.
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: VofD on February 26, 2011, 04:07:26 PM
Start the second half with Twiss and Beesley on to have any chance.

FFS it has happened ??? ??? ???
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: Nonleaguer on February 26, 2011, 04:09:44 PM
Who says Ken doesn't heed internet scouting  ::)
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: TheCultOfIanTunnacliffe on February 26, 2011, 04:11:13 PM
The first may have been offside but that does not explain the lack of any meaningful challenge on somehow advancing with the ball on goal as was the case for the second. The goals against column in the table says it all.

Are you there?

Wimbledon's second goal:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9x18GqptXN8 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9x18GqptXN8)

Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: hsmith1 on February 26, 2011, 04:11:28 PM
3078 with67 from alty
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: alty.fc on February 26, 2011, 04:13:52 PM
The first may have been offside but that does not explain the lack of any meaningful challenge on somehow advancing with the ball on goal as was the case for the second. The goals against column in the table says it all.

Are you there?

Wimbledon's second goal:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9x18GqptXN8 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9x18GqptXN8)



Looked a soft goal
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: markecky on February 26, 2011, 04:14:29 PM
Well done Bath..2-1 against port
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: TheCultOfIanTunnacliffe on February 26, 2011, 04:14:37 PM
Drewe Broughton has played for one or two clubs, hasn't he......?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drewe_Broughton (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drewe_Broughton)

Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: altyusa on February 26, 2011, 04:15:56 PM
Come on Alty!
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: Jacko on February 26, 2011, 04:17:07 PM
Ffsake were gonna get panned 6-0 here  :(
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: alty.fc on February 26, 2011, 04:17:34 PM
good god these commentators are bloody awful :)
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: Nonleaguer on February 26, 2011, 04:18:11 PM
Forest Green 2-0 up, when we play, we need to rile Styche (hes on 10 or more yellow cards and has a short fuse) & Dyer, both played at Hednesford Town in the past and were scouted by league clubs.
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: alty.fc on February 26, 2011, 04:20:52 PM
poop
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: TheCultOfIanTunnacliffe on February 26, 2011, 04:22:38 PM

So, Danny Kedwell emulates Kettering's J-P Marna in scoring five goals against Alty this season.

Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: robininstockport on February 26, 2011, 04:23:19 PM
He's not bloody finished yet!!
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: robininstockport on February 26, 2011, 04:26:13 PM
Can Crawley and Fleetwood please score.
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: markecky on February 26, 2011, 04:28:55 PM
Now put my half and half Crawley and United scarf on..come on Crawley!
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: Nonleaguer on February 26, 2011, 04:29:41 PM
Most underreaction ever for a goal
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: TheCultOfIanTunnacliffe on February 26, 2011, 04:29:50 PM
My God.....we've actually scored from a corner!

Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: chesteralty on February 26, 2011, 04:30:45 PM
Great player Marc Joseph......always liked him!!
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: markecky on February 26, 2011, 04:31:07 PM
Good to see we havent given up..
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: Toff Apple on February 26, 2011, 04:31:17 PM
stockport 2-1 up but down to 9 men
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: markecky on February 26, 2011, 04:32:19 PM
Tubbs on for Crawley...
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: markecky on February 26, 2011, 04:32:38 PM
Hayes 1-1
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: B. 4D on February 26, 2011, 04:33:37 PM
Well done Mark Joseph.
2 more please ;)
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: thegazelle on February 26, 2011, 04:34:04 PM
walked back in and we score yessssss
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: 62vintage on February 26, 2011, 04:34:20 PM
For some reason I lost the commentary for a while, anyone else have the same problem  
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: hsmith1 on February 26, 2011, 04:35:46 PM
from jl,think hes getting excited
69 3-1 JPSEPH HEADS IN A cLEE CORNER

Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: hsmith1 on February 26, 2011, 04:36:01 PM
connors sent off.
same here 62
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: TheCultOfIanTunnacliffe on February 26, 2011, 04:36:12 PM
Oh brilliant.....another red card.


Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: Toff Apple on February 26, 2011, 04:37:32 PM
he did come with a reputation
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: robininstockport on February 26, 2011, 04:38:12 PM
Looks like Hewson will be back in then
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: B. 4D on February 26, 2011, 04:38:17 PM
Thats blown it.
Not what we needed
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: TheCultOfIanTunnacliffe on February 26, 2011, 04:38:21 PM
Good old Michael Rankine for York!
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: Stan Hibbert on February 26, 2011, 04:38:27 PM
Oh brilliant.....another red card.

In the space of a week our midfiled bolstered by Wedgbury and Connors now looks as weak as p*ss.

York are winning though!
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: markecky on February 26, 2011, 04:39:01 PM
Get in York,,
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: 62vintage on February 26, 2011, 04:39:32 PM
Was it a straight red or second yellow?
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: Stan Hibbert on February 26, 2011, 04:40:00 PM
Was it a straight red or second yellow?

2nd Yellow as per SKY Sports..
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: Nonleaguer on February 26, 2011, 04:40:21 PM
Is that the midfield that finished mid table in the past two seasons open your eyes SH?
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: timbo13 on February 26, 2011, 04:40:58 PM
JL says second yellow
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: TheCultOfIanTunnacliffe on February 26, 2011, 04:41:11 PM
Wimbledon's third goal:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sjOJMZteJ1A (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sjOJMZteJ1A)


Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: Sleepy the dwarf on February 26, 2011, 04:41:23 PM
Fleetwood beating eastbourne
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: Stan Hibbert on February 26, 2011, 04:41:54 PM
Is that the midfield that finished mid table in the past two seasons open your eyes SH?

Fine, you dont have to agree with me - didnt ask you to
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: TheCultOfIanTunnacliffe on February 26, 2011, 04:42:29 PM
Is that the midfield that finished mid table in the past two seasons open your eyes SH?

No, it isn't.

Key absentee: Kearney.

Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: hsmith1 on February 26, 2011, 04:42:34 PM
4-1 game over now
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: chris888 on February 26, 2011, 04:42:46 PM
eastbourne winning
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: Sleepy the dwarf on February 26, 2011, 04:43:38 PM
Fleetwood beating eastbourne

Arse. Now corrected by Sky. Eastbourne winning
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: Stan Hibbert on February 26, 2011, 04:43:48 PM
Is that the midfield that finished mid table in the past two seasons open your eyes SH?

No, it isn't.

Key absentee: Kearney.


Thanks - I couldnt be arsed biting
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: TheCultOfIanTunnacliffe on February 26, 2011, 04:44:03 PM
eastbourne winning

The day just gets better and better.....

Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: markecky on February 26, 2011, 04:44:21 PM
Its all Crawley on the commentary..
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: 62vintage on February 26, 2011, 04:44:53 PM
Another goal straight after we had a chance.
Have just seen their third goal on You Tube, and our defending looked terrible.
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: markecky on February 26, 2011, 04:45:04 PM
CRAWLEY SCORE
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: TheCultOfIanTunnacliffe on February 26, 2011, 04:46:39 PM
CRAWLEY SCORE

THANK GOD!

Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: Stan Hibbert on February 26, 2011, 04:46:51 PM
CRAWLEY SCORE

Good stuff
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: Toff Apple on February 26, 2011, 04:47:30 PM
how injured is coburn?
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: Nonleaguer on February 26, 2011, 04:49:13 PM
I forgot about Kearney, he displaced Lawton for the most part last season.
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: wayno on February 26, 2011, 04:49:43 PM
How injured is Denham as well?
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: Toff Apple on February 26, 2011, 04:50:30 PM
big winners fgr and eastbourne today
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: B. 4D on February 26, 2011, 04:51:04 PM
Dons down to ten men
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: TheCultOfIanTunnacliffe on February 26, 2011, 04:51:21 PM
How injured is Denham as well?

Due to have an operation, I believe.

Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: markecky on February 26, 2011, 04:53:13 PM
BArrow lose..
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: B. 4D on February 26, 2011, 04:55:51 PM
At least we have no game till next Sat.
The lads can have a good rest.
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: hsmith1 on February 26, 2011, 04:56:07 PM
4-1
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: hsmith1 on February 26, 2011, 04:56:55 PM
from JL
FT Alty lose 4-1 but kept going to the end as Smith goes off injured leaving Alty down to 9 men
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: markecky on February 26, 2011, 04:57:47 PM
Results not as bad as at one stage...was vital that Hayes lost at home and that Barrow and Port lost away.

Eastbourne result is stupid but shows Fleetwood can be beaten.

FGR is just annoying, I hate Tamworth.
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: robininstockport on February 26, 2011, 04:58:53 PM
Not the best day ever but could have been worse.

Another hard  match on Sat
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: TheCultOfIanTunnacliffe on February 26, 2011, 04:59:01 PM
Our next opponents, Gateshead, have continued their recent fine form by knocking Blyth out of the FA Trophy.

Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: Darren on February 26, 2011, 05:01:08 PM
How many goals has Dootson let in now?
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: Nonleaguer on February 26, 2011, 05:06:13 PM
Dootson is only as good as his defence and if you watch the You tube videos of the goals it's not only the keeper left wanting.
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: B. 4D on February 26, 2011, 05:11:27 PM
lets not start the goalkeeper debate again.
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: Mallorca Alty on February 26, 2011, 05:51:21 PM
Looking at the stats on ESPN. Okay you can't trust the stats but AFC Wimbledon concede 11 fouls, Alty concede 11 fouls. Total cautions AFC Wimbledon 1 Alty 6(including Connors 2 cautions). Were our fouls more reckless than Wimbledon's fouls?
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: Jimmy Hill on February 26, 2011, 10:46:01 PM
Dootson wasn't to blame for any of the goals.

The referee was decent, all our cautions were probably warranted.
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: Ray on February 26, 2011, 11:07:04 PM
Dootson wasn't to blame for any of the goals.

The referee was decent, all our cautions were probably warranted.

This one deserved a straight red

http://wdon.com/media/tv/card.jpg

one of the other 'tackles' disclocated the shoulder of our centre half.
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: markecky on February 26, 2011, 11:10:13 PM
Dootson wasn't to blame for any of the goals.

The referee was decent, all our cautions were probably warranted.

This one deserved a straight red

http://wdon.com/media/tv/card.jpg

one of the other 'tackles' disclocated the shoulder of our centre half.

If you freeze frame many tackles they would look terrible.  We are not a dirty team at all.

As as for a tackle dislocating a shoulder it was either the highest recorded tackle in history of the bloke has been fouled and fallen awkwardly.

I doubt our player thought "I'll dislocate this blokes shoulder"
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: bumble on February 26, 2011, 11:12:48 PM
Just home - coach was late picking us up :|

4-1 wasnt a fair score line IMo - twiss' card wasn't warranted - and I wish he did tackles like that more - just a solid tackle 50/50 ball

The sending off - the tackle was a fk maybe just a booking but unlucky - though our defence actually played well , the first goal was offside - the fourth we were unlucky to concede

Thought carl played well again - one moment stood out where he had 4 running at him in a counter, no panicking or fouling and cleared it
-positives - we caused problems for them , we looked a side capable of staying up , and unlike previous games we looked threatening from our corners
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: Nasha on February 27, 2011, 04:53:47 AM
Peake for bumble  ;)

Like he says though, I thought 4-1 was a harsh result. We appealed for offisde, but none of the players did, so that is a good sign that he was onside and it was a legitimate goal. 2nd we let them walk through, 3rd was a good run by Kedwell,taking on 2 players before turning it in. Our goal was weird, as we actually scored from a corner!!!! Then the 4th, Clee crosses a man later IMO, they counter,and the shot hits Piergainni.

We had periods in the game. Twiss was tugged in the area, and there was no doubt in my mind if that was outside the area it was a free kick.

Overall, we gave a good account of ourselves, and a lot of Wimbledon fans I spoke to after the game said they would be surprised if we went down. But good performances count for nowt.4 points minimum are needed against Gateshead and Barrow, and I see no reason why we can't

COME ON ALTY!!!
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: andrewflynn on February 27, 2011, 10:36:51 AM
I think York were better than Wimbledon were, Wimbledon just had an in form Kedwell upfront. Without him I reckon we could have got a point because none of their other players looked remotely threatening and on a whole we didn't deal with them badly and pushed forward for large parts of the second half.

Connor's dismissal, in my opinion, was unjust. His second yellow was definitely a booking but the challenge for his first was never in a million years a yellow card. Neither, for that matter, were Young or Piergianni's.

If I'm honest I didn't see whether the first was offside or not, but from where we were all stood it was bang in line with the line our defence was holding and the majority of our lot were livid so I joined in with the heckling of the liner regardless.

It's all little things really though in a game we were always going to struggle in, the bigger test is bouncing back and getting at Gateshead on Saturday. There's no time to dwell lads keep your heads up and keep putting the effort in because it's still completely in our hands.
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: bighairedmike on February 27, 2011, 11:54:26 AM
I think York were better than Wimbledon were, Wimbledon just had an in form Kedwell upfront. Without him I reckon we could have got a point because none of their other players looked remotely threatening and on a whole we didn't deal with them badly and pushed forward for large parts of the second half.

Connor's dismissal, in my opinion, was unjust. His second yellow was definitely a booking but the challenge for his first was never in a million years a yellow card. Neither, for that matter, were Young or Piergianni's.

If I'm honest I didn't see whether the first was offside or not, but from where we were all stood it was bang in line with the line our defence was holding and the majority of our lot were livid so I joined in with the heckling of the liner regardless.

It's all little things really though in a game we were always going to struggle in, the bigger test is bouncing back and getting at Gateshead on Saturday. There's no time to dwell lads keep your heads up and keep putting the effort in because it's still completely in our hands.


That is one of my favourite lines to have been read on this forum.  ;D
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: Jimmy Hill on February 27, 2011, 12:31:36 PM
AFC were just very efficient. There was no room for us to play, the midfield and defence was constantly pressured when in possession.

If we were going to create a chance we would have had to make 10-15 good passes and we're just not good enough to do that.
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: Leon on February 27, 2011, 02:45:31 PM
Not a terrible performance and a game where we could have got something, in a funny way, but they took their chances very well and it was comfortable for them in the end.

Connors' sending off was idiotic. To put in a challenge like that at 3-1 down and when on a yellow card was absolutely ridiculous - it was a borderline straight red. A number of our players seem to lose their heads again - something that's crept in this season which I haven't seen in recent years. I am staggered that anyone could question Twiss's yellow card - it was a dreadful and petty late challenge. I agree with Jimmy H that the ref was perfectly fine.

I thought the first goal was probably onside but would need to see a replay to be sure. The second was definitely onside: Piergianni played Kedwell on. Carl's positioning was bad throughout in those situations - the left wing-back should not be the last man in defence.

I also half wonder whether Dootson was right to rush out for the first two goals: he made Kedwell's mind up for him and the two finishes were simple side-foots. If he'd stayed on the six yard line, it would have at least forced Kedwell to go for a bit more power.

Oh and yet again, in a brief sub appearance, Danylyk played with composure and good sense. What McKenna has against him I cannot imagine - I'd have him in the team every time.
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: hsmith1 on February 27, 2011, 05:14:42 PM
wimbledon are a good honest club,i for one wish them well and do not hold the 4-1 defeat against them.wish there was more clubs around like them.
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: SW on February 27, 2011, 06:15:26 PM
wimbledon are a good honest club,i for one wish them well and do not hold the 4-1 defeat against them.wish there was more clubs around like them.

Agree to a certain extent having been there many times over the years but they have a significant element of one-eyed supporters who take every decision against them as some kind of personal affront. They abuse referees routinely and seemingly expect everything to go their own way otherwise the toys are chucked out of the pram. Additionally their latest match arrangements are not exactly away fan friendly, we now get a corner of the side terrace with an impeded view as the stand is tiny and the steps shallow, and for Christ's know's why you need to get a ticket to get in if you arrive 30 seconds after kick off, for which you have to circumnavigate the ground and go in the bar of all places to obtain one, then return to where you were first directed to find the segregation is bollocks and their fans come and go between you as they please. Why on earth do you need a ticket for a pay on the gate non league game? Big club maybe. Professional outfit, I don't think so.
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: Brian Flynn on February 27, 2011, 07:44:03 PM
How injured is Denham as well?

He's very injured!
Possibly back for the last few games of the season.........at best.
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: Brian Flynn on February 27, 2011, 07:47:10 PM
How many goals has Dootson let in now?

My estimate would be about 750.
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: Brian Flynn on February 27, 2011, 08:23:43 PM
Odd game.........completely stifled them for 35 minutes & then we have a couple of minutes of pressure...including a good chance.....Wimbledon break & we immediately look stretched & go one down.............I don't think it was offside....great finish.
The best two players on the pitch, Yussuf & Kedwell, take advantage of some sloppy defending & we're pretty well out of it.

We did OK going forward after the break, but  we could have conceded 6 or 7.Kedwell missed his easiest chance of the afternoon....a header.......& Dootson tipped a decent effort from the great man onto the bar.Wimbledon missed other good chances, although their first & last goals could have been preceded by Alty goals on another day.

No qualms with the referee.......he did a decent job.

It was good to see Anthony Danylyk given a few minutes....even if the game was dead by the time he came on...he looked good & could be quite an important player in the last two months of the season.

Wimbledon are a decent side & if I had to forecast how their season will end, I would say losing play-off finalists.
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: SW on February 27, 2011, 08:40:08 PM
The first goal was a street offside Flynny but the result was fair.
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: AltyTunnelSteward on February 27, 2011, 10:01:18 PM
wimbledon are a good honest club,i for one wish them well and do not hold the 4-1 defeat against them.wish there was more clubs around like them.

 they have a significant element of one-eyed supporters who take every decision against them as some kind of personal affront. They abuse referees routinely and seemingly expect everything to go their own way otherwise the toys are chucked out of the pram.

Name me a club, us included,to whom the above doesn't apply
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: Leon on February 27, 2011, 10:35:40 PM
The first goal was a street offside Flynny but the result was fair.

Have a look at the video on the AFCW website - looks roughly a mews onside to me.
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: SW on February 28, 2011, 06:13:01 PM
The first goal was a street offside Flynny but the result was fair.

Have a look at the video on the AFCW website - looks roughly a mews onside to me.
Ok Leon having watched it it looks ok, but I'm not having a mews, I'll agree to a ginnell  ;)

Good call actually by the much abused lino!
Title: Re: AFCW match thread
Post by: Brian Flynn on March 01, 2011, 01:07:34 AM
The first goal was a street offside Flynny but the result was fair.

Have a look at the video on the AFCW website - looks roughly a mews onside to me.
Ok Leon having watched it it looks ok, but I'm not having a mews, I'll agree to a ginnell  ;)

Good call actually by the much abused lino!

It was a very good call.