There really isnt a defence, because the player was scheduled to miss the first game as of 23rd December as punishment for receiving 5 cautions. The Chesterfield match was on the 23rd December and it is therefore obvious that he should have been suspended for that game. Surely managers/secretarys have some sort of recording system for these things, even a basic calendar would have assisted them in this case. Droylsden had to be thrown out as it is is a similar case which befell Bury 2 years ago. If memory serves the Stalybridge affair concerned another club and international clearance which as we know can be a mindfield. It is not the FAs fault for Droylsden's incompetence. Lets club together and buy them a calender for 2009!