www.altyfans.co.uk

General Category => Altrincham FC First Team => Topic started by: Hemel Alty on December 03, 2014, 05:07:39 PM

Title: Disallowed Goal
Post by: Hemel Alty on December 03, 2014, 05:07:39 PM
Not much contact there - looks like he just plain missed it

http://www.wokingfc.co.uk/gallery/woking_2014_15/woking_2_-_altrincham_0/alt18.JPG#thepic

Title: Re: Disallowed Goal
Post by: ripleym on December 03, 2014, 05:57:26 PM
If I put horrendously blurry images like that up, people would tell me...right?
Title: Re: Disallowed Goal
Post by: ManagementGuru on December 03, 2014, 06:02:18 PM
The keeper's flouncy leap is exactly as I recall - with Marshall nowhere near him.  And as you can see keeper is not exactly looking at the ball
Title: Re: Disallowed Goal
Post by: Red robin on December 03, 2014, 07:22:15 PM
i agree keeper flapped at it,there was no foul
Title: Re: Disallowed Goal
Post by: robininstockport on December 03, 2014, 07:41:06 PM
Shocking decision!

Looked decent Woking

Does anyone know why Lawrie was subbed ?
Title: Re: Disallowed Goal
Post by: AltyTunnelSteward on December 03, 2014, 11:42:58 PM
Goalkeepers are overprotected

I must have said that hundreds of times in my reffing career after giving what seemed like soft free kicks.....as i suspect have many officials at all levels.

There is a reason for it, and I know that this is wrong what I'm saying.

If you give a free kick then most people have forgotten about it and moved on to your next "howler" within ten minutes and two days later it may as well have not happened.

If you don't and a goal occurs, you can't "ungive" it as it is a matter of record and will be there for perpetuity
Title: Re: Disallowed Goal
Post by: alty.fc on December 04, 2014, 07:53:20 AM
Watched the highlights poor poor decision and who knows what going one up could have done to the game
Title: Re: Disallowed Goal
Post by: Hamilton on December 04, 2014, 01:29:16 PM
Goalkeepers are overprotected

I must have said that hundreds of times in my reffing career after giving what seemed like soft free kicks.....as i suspect have many officials at all levels.

There is a reason for it, and I know that this is wrong what I'm saying.

If you give a free kick then most people have forgotten about it and moved on to your next "howler" within ten minutes and two days later it may as well have not happened.

If you don't and a goal occurs, you can't "ungive" it as it is a matter of record and will be there for perpetuity

I said as much on the RR form during the commentary.
Title: Re: Disallowed Goal
Post by: Number23 on December 04, 2014, 10:14:06 PM
Goalkeepers are overprotected

I must have said that hundreds of times in my reffing career after giving what seemed like soft free kicks.....as i suspect have many officials at all levels.

There is a reason for it, and I know that this is wrong what I'm saying.

If you give a free kick then most people have forgotten about it and moved on to your next "howler" within ten minutes and two days later it may as well have not happened.

If you don't and a goal occurs, you can't "ungive" it as it is a matter of record and will be there for perpetuity

From behind the play (or wherever the ref was) it might have looked like there was significant contact. From the side where we were it was obvious that there was some distance between Tom and the keeper at the point when the keeper missed it .
The ref may have an excuse but the lino must have had a better view. The ball was in the net so there was an opportunity for the ref to consult. He just didn't bother.  
Title: Re: Disallowed Goal
Post by: Hale Alty on December 05, 2014, 07:46:24 AM
Not much contact there - looks like he just plain missed it

http://www.wokingfc.co.uk/gallery/woking_2014_15/woking_2_-_altrincham_0/alt18.JPG#thepic



Apart from Marshall's hand and elbow tickling the goalkeeper's ribs.