I think the situation with the ref summarises everything that is wrong with refereeing in England.
The poor guy is out of sorts at this level, his inability to see the blinding obvious leads to silly mistakes being made.
However, were in the fifth division of English football. The officials we get are not going to be the best.
Recruitment for refereeing is difficult. 9 times out of 10 you leave the venue having annoyed someone with a decision, you are often verbally abused at the game from people who see the situation from a different angle.
This league should be for up and coming referees to learn and develop. Unfortunately, we've not got enough youngsters coming through, so we have these old dinosaurs making errors and costing teams vital points. From the video 'ive seen, yesterday the ref made some very poor decisions. It is not the first time we have been on the end of some poor decisions from this guy either.
That nobody as yet seems to have quoted any actual facts or accurate information, relying instead on opinion and speculation is a total irrelevance.
Well, er the only "opinion" given is that the guy made mistakes. This is a "fact" due to the "fact" he did make lots of mistakes. There are not enough seconds available to detail every single mistake. It would take over the 90 minutes of "refereeing" to list them all. The main point here is the issue of particular referee's constantly making wrong decisions that cost teams points. One assumes that the individual concerned is given feedback after the event. However, on the performance yesterday, it would seem that this feedback may be quite poor (my final sentence is an "opinion" due to the author's lack of knowledge regarding feedback given to match officials).