My own idea is that two or three of us are elected and there a regular monthly meetings between the fans representatives and the board. We discuss items like new ideas for fundraising, the team, but more importantly we bridge the gap between board and fans which currently seems to exist. To represent the fans, the members must be of long standing support, know the club well inside out, and be approachable and intelligent to both fans and board. We use email to communicate with fans and go to board with any ideas submitted. Communication is also a valuable asset in this role.
Any others fans wish to expand on this. Feel free to criticise; or any opinions from members of the board? It is after all our club; and I for one do not want us to sink any lower than we already have done or seem to be doing on the pitch. I also appreciate this has to be ratified at board level.
Jimmy Hill, point taken but would you volunteer!!??
Steve,
That's a marvellous scenario in theory......but there's not a cat in hell's chance of it happening.
The board of directors under Geoff Goodwin, of which our current chairman was a prominent member, actively sought to destabilise and initiate the downfall of STAR.
They never trusted the aims of STAR and what made things worse for the board was that they had no control over STAR.
They duly succeeded back in 2006.
Consequently, up pops TASC with a certain Grahame Rowley on the committee, thereby ensuring that such a supporters association has no autonomy or independence whatsoever.
It's all about control.
Have you not observed just how the club's fanbase has been patronised and besmirched both at public meetings and in the press in recent times?
It's a case of we know best, now give us your money and run along and don't expect to have any say in matters.