I think that too much has actually gone on for anything to happen and the conference may just have to try and let it ride. Depends on BS and Setenta I guess, will there be more damage done by clubs being chucked out or remaining in the league but in a mess. Whilst Crawley, Boston, Halifax, Weymuff are hardly Real Madrid I don't think Steenta would want a league with us Tam Port St Albans Droylsden F\rsley Histon Salisbury in it. How weak would that league be?
Whilst I think Crawley should have been chucked out ages ago I dont't garee with all the shenanigans. i.e. the rules should say, in administration for more than 3 months - definately relegated, enter into a CVA - thrown out immediately, as things stand they don't exactly say that. Therefore, Halifax have no chairnman etc, big deal, they'll get taken over, no way they won't not play on.. So Crawley pay people less than they owe them, nowt to do with football just means that no one will give them credit, Weymuff owe £2mil, doesn't make much different.. Boston are just hamming up the difficulty, wheres he benefit in saying oh look we've sorted everything out.. And as for Vics - they've got an ego trip chairman and no manager, hardly unusual or grounds for being thrown out.
I don't really think any could be thrown out if we're honest. For me I think we have a problem in that Southport need finished 2 places below us, 3 teams may be 2 much for Charlie Clapham to justify, if they were behind us maybe CRawley and Boston would cop it, God knows. Also don't think there is too much pressure from other clubs, I doubt Phil Wallace post Trophy money gives a toss about anyone else in the league at all now and Peakeys mob are safe and looking a settled club.
I don't think the conference clubs want to rock the boat and jeopordise their new cash (The conf can easily withold tv money as bonds of paymentas well). I can't see how you could chuck one out but not 3 or 4, is there really a difference between Weymouth who are in admin and Crawley who are not.
I would hope for a reprieve but can't see it. A real sham as next year looks a weakish conference that I'm sure we could do better in. What I will say is that if no one is chucked out then it confirms that the conference is sorrupt. Not because we'll go down (as we should really
) but for the teams in the past who have been thrown out, if Crawley don't go compared to say Scarboe I think all the chucked out clubs will know it was due to whims and political pressures rather than consistency of policies.