www.altyfans.co.uk

See here:

https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.12.23.21268276v1.full

According to their findings, the risk of myocarditis approximately  doubles for most of these "vaccines", though with the Moderna one it is apparently as much as 14 times higher. The increased risks indicated in the study would appear to be broadly in line with the increased amount of cardiac incidents reported among footballers and other athletes in 2021.

The evidence seems to be mounting up for a heart risk from these "vaccines" and any younger males at low risk who are considering having these products 3 or 4 times a year for a decade (as some are suggesting) would be well advised to research this matter carefully first. One might reasonably assume that if there is an issue as suggested by this study, the risk will increase the more times one takes this medication.

Still, it begs the question - how credible are some of these rules  if they can't realistically be enforced? And how much will people's respect for rules be damaged? I remember a story that people were more likely to keep speed limits when they could see that there were good reasons for them. Now we have been living through a time where it is virtually impossible to keep every rule (as politicians have repeatedly demonstrated) and that baffle many. I fear a lasting effect.

We won't go down unless we have a serious injury crisis like 1997. Almost certainly (unfortunately).

With crowd limits of 50, Welsh rugby wants to know what they are supposed to do about lower league matches on council land where anyone can turn up, should they end up with rather more than 50 people there, like once happened with Packet House.
I suppose it'll be like in that 1942 film "One of Our Aircraft Is Missing" when they were only allowed 200 people at the match in occupied Holland and the German police demanded that 50 leave! Never mind, three weeks to flatten the curve...

But will it help in any future bid for Ashley Hemmings? Or is that wishful thinking?

I must say I'm a bit surprised by it. I think they're a bit lucky to get a chance at a bigger club after the Chester "City" debacle!

Sounds exciting and full of promise, welcome Isaac and good luck.

If the right striker doesn't come along, so be it - I'd rather stay as we are rather than signing another dud out of desperation like that journeyman lad we had last year, can't even remember the name of him now.

I think I get it now. In the absence of a top class number 9 until we go full time (hopefully), we just play 5 attacking midfielders instead. And by creating enough chances, some of them are bound to be scored, even if it's Jake Moult on the end of them.

To be fair, our goals scored is pretty decent this season anyway. And worth remembering that we haven't had a good second season in the "Conference" (after getting into it) since 1980-81. I will still be very happy with the 14th to 16th place that I predicted.