I just need to make it clear that the delay in the response on this issue is solely down to me. Mike and I have discussed the issue a number of times - so Mike has fulfilled his duties on this - and I raised it at the last Board meeting where we discussed implications and lessons learnt at some length - so the (rest of the) board too have stepped up to the mark. It is my job to go back to Mike with a response to the points he has raised and I have not done this yet. It is simply down to pressures of work, and perhaps inappropriate prioritisation on my part. There is no cover up, only my inability to get this done. It will be issued shortly and once again I apologise for the delay.