I think we all agree that our League position is not precisely what we would want it to be.
Therefore might it not be an idea for us to put our personal differences aside, temporarily forget our prejudices about individuals and get 100% behind whoever is entrusted to try to lead the Club out of its current position.
Well, I've tried my utmost to ignore this post but I'm afraid it's simply annoyed me far too much!
Earlier on this very thread, it was your good self who wanted to canvass opinion regarding some people's objections to the long-term appointment of a few nominated candidates to replace Lee Sinnott.
Several contributors duly responded with perfectly valid and reasonable perspectives on this issue.
Now we are advised that we have merely been expressing prejudices against certain individuals, presumably as none of these viewpoints happen to coincide with your own which, notwithstanding a couple of requests, you have still failed to enlighten us with (although I think that we could all hazard a fairly accurate guess on that topic).
To compound matters, you then produce the insulting implication that we would not offer our 100% support to Lee Sinnott's successor in the event of them not being our manager of choice.
The club is bigger than the individual, Phil.
All I really care about at the moment is for the Board to appoint someone who can ensure that next season's Alty fixture list doesn't contain matches against FCUM or even Salford City.
Frankly, I'm disappointed, Phil, and I believe that an apology is in order.