Earlier on this very thread, you asked people to expand upon their objections to any prospective appointment of Neil Tolson as Alty's manager.
Several contributors responded and outlined various valid reasons for disregarding Tolson.
Meanwhile, we are still awaiting you (or, indeed, anyone else on here) to propound a reasonable case for Tolson's succession.
Frankly, I'd be fascinated to see how you can divorce him from any degree of culpability for the current malaise which is afflicting the first team.
Time for new blood.
Cult, I've aired this viewpoint in more general terms about assistants taking over from exiting managers, I'd never do it. Although clearly I have no problem with Tols holding the fort for the Barrow game.
What I'd say is that I can't see any massive differences between him and LS. In these situations, you can often see a cavalier young manager with an experienced assistant who steps up and steadies the ship, or vice versa sometimes.
In this situation I couldn't say how Tols can be exempt from blame - clearly LS wasn't.
Of course, it depends what drove the decision. There'll be factors we, rightly, won't know about. Maybe the players had stopped listening to LS, maybe some had fallen out with him, I couldn't say (and it doesn't appear to be anything that drastic to be fair)
My own opinion is that Lee Sinnott's tenure had run it's natural course, as these things often do. And most managers leave under a much darker cloud than this.
That said, bet I'm not generous if we do end up getting relegated!