www.altyfans.co.uk
General Category => Altrincham FC First Team => Topic started by: ripleym on January 24, 2015, 11:29:40 PM
-
http://www.michaelripleyphotography.com/#!bath-city-vs-altrincham-fc---jan-2015/clgr (http://www.michaelripleyphotography.com/#!bath-city-vs-altrincham-fc---jan-2015/clgr)
-
The large one towards the bottom left summed up their tackling style all afternoon and the ref was quite happy to let them slide in from all angles - still fuming at his decision to award the free kick they scored from after having played the advantage. I don't mind if they make mistakes or don't see things but they should know the laws of the game!
-
The large one towards the bottom left summed up their tackling style all afternoon and the ref was quite happy to let them slide in from all angles - still fuming at his decision to award the free kick they scored from after having played the advantage. I don't mind if they make mistakes or don't see things but they should know the laws of the game!
Seems like you're saying that the ref can't give a free kick once they have played advantage? Suggest you take a quick look at the laws in that case!
-
I thought it was only rugby where the ref can signal play on and then later give a free kick for the same offence if the offended team don't get a good outcome from the advantage- if there had been a second foul then fair enough but to give a team two bites at the cherry isn't something you normally see - I must admit I'd assumed it wasn't allowed otherwise why don't you see it all the time?
-
I thought it was only rugby where the ref can signal play on and then later give a free kick for the same offence if the offended team don't get a good outcome from the advantage- if there had been a second foul then fair enough but to give a team two bites at the cherry isn't something you normally see - I must admit I'd assumed it wasn't allowed otherwise why don't you see it all the time?
Actually there was a second foul - for which Moult was booked - and the ref went back to the place of the first offence for the free-kick, which seems fair enough to me.
-
If he'd given a free kick when densmore I think it was, was shoved off the ball, they wouldnt have won a free kick. He wasn't the reason we lost the game as he made terrible decisions all afternoon, both sides should have had at least a penalty each. I'm still bloody livid, we should have had enough to win that game. We need an injection of pace, I'd start building for next season
-
I thought it was only rugby where the ref can signal play on and then later give a free kick for the same offence if the offended team don't get a good outcome from the advantage- if there had been a second foul then fair enough but to give a team two bites at the cherry isn't something you normally see - I must admit I'd assumed it wasn't allowed otherwise why don't you see it all the time?
Actually there was a second foul - for which Moult was booked - and the ref went back to the place of the first offence for the free-kick, which seems fair enough to me.
If he gave the second foul then surely you give the freekick from the spot where the second offence occurred? I assumed Moult booking was dissent for pointing out he'd played advantage and shouldn't go back to the first offence, in a way the ref didn't appreciate.