Oh yes you certainly can voice an opinion and if you want a diatribe I'm sure I can do better than my last post.
I'm more than happy to debate the issue of Refereeing rather than trade diatribes and/or insults
If you take the time to read rather than just discount and disrespect my post you will see that I've just highlighted that the Referee's performance is reactive to the behaviour of the players on the field of play.
Had the tackle on Logan been on an Alty player would you have been of the opinion that it wasn't a red card? (This isn't an inflammatory or sarcastic comment but an honest question) One of the issues new and developing referees have to address is that of different peoples perceptions of any single incident which can be hard when it is purely down to an individuals opinion based on a single split second view of the incident.
You assume I didnt read your post.
You assume I don't know what a ref has to do on the pitch.
You assume i'm not aware that i'm biased towards alty when it comes to reffing decisions (not that it has anything to do with a decision in a Barrow v Oxford game)
You assume that anyone who disagrees with your own rose-tinted viewpoint is out to 'disrespect', 'discount' and 'insult' you.
I agree with someone else, it was a bad decision, no need for the card, it affected the game. That really is about it.