www.altyfans.co.uk

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

PLEASE JOIN THE ALTRINCHAM FC PATRONS SCHEME TODAY
* HELP THE CLUB THROUGH THE COVID-19 SHUTDOWN
* HELP FUND THE CLUB TO BIGGER AND BRIGHTER THINGS
* HELP THE MANAGERS ATTRACT THE PLAYERS THEY NEED TO PUSH THE CLUB FORWARD

https://www.altrinchamfc.com/club/the-patrons-scheme

+ www.altyfans.co.uk » Profile of Amsterdam Alty » Show Posts
 Messages

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - Amsterdam Alty

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 ... 134
46
Altrincham FC First Team / Re: Hartlepool United (A) Match Thread
« on: February 21, 2024, 01:58:52 PM »
Ollie,
is better than matt


You’ve got to be joking here right?

Ollie Byrne isn’t quite Andy Dawber bad but he’s not far off. I’d play an outfield player in goal if Ross and Gould were both injured
This is all a bit too far, for me he is better than Gould just on the basis he's similar skill level, but larger human.

I'd still not play him when his bottom lip might trip him up at any moment.



47
Altrincham FC First Team / Re: Hartlepool United (A) Match Thread
« on: February 20, 2024, 10:05:02 PM »
That was too much rotation

48
Altrincham FC First Team / Re: Hartlepool United (A) Match Thread
« on: February 20, 2024, 02:40:12 PM »
Our starting 10 outfield players are a way in front of the bench and squad players
James Jones CB
Justin Donowa RB
Mooney RW

All as good I think as the starting option.

Wilson CM
Roscoe CB
Angus CF

All better than some previous recent starters for the club.

I think this year we have some depth that is Conference starting standard. A rarity in all our years in this league to be honest. Our performances are a mix of skill, atmosphere, and attitude. I think this goes deeper than our starting lineup. I wouldn't be against starting 9/11 first-teamers each game in the name of rotation.


49
Altrincham FC First Team / Re: Aldershot
« on: February 17, 2024, 10:26:10 PM »
Aldershot are the epitome of a team that you should never bet on the scorelines for.
This again x100

50
Altrincham FC First Team / Re: Crowds
« on: February 17, 2024, 12:22:23 PM »
Are we all delusional?? What crowds have we got over the past 10 years or beyond?Every club has an ultimate crowd potential. Why have we not got more crowds over the years? I fear we are being bamboozled. If we do not get promoted how many will we get next season? Not 2500 for sure even week..Mark my words. Nice ambition but  not realistic
Plenty will come back next year if we don't get promoted because they will be coming because of the product and the continued optimism they have experienced this year. Only a catastrophic drop in form will see the crowds drop hugely.

The increase in fans is not an Altrincham exclusive thing. The growth of lower league football crowds is all over the pyramid; however, if you want to keep the floating fans longer term, they will want a few things we just don't offer with current facilities, and that will be why they don't come week in and week out.

Also, if you think the club isn't doing new things to gain awareness than they were doing 10 years ago you are missing a beat. Radio Alty, Alty TV, Altrincham Today, Great Social Media Presence, and High Street store are all essentially worlds away from the 1990s club site and black and white match photos outside the ground we had before then.

51
Altrincham FC First Team / Re: Mission Football League
« on: February 16, 2024, 10:37:56 PM »
If all the "best community club" doesn't sound like a facility for the community around a new ground I don't know how they could stake that claim. We already have a huge junior network in the town and a facility for community use on site.

Great to see some more noise about this, I understand the more understated this whole thing is the better it probably is in terms of the negative side of big money people. I just wish I had a bit more to boast about I guess.

52
Altrincham FC First Team / Re: Crowds
« on: February 16, 2024, 10:31:09 PM »
If the town isn't capable of drawing 3.5k crowds with it's catchment area I'd be surprised honestly.

We're only just now really managing to raise town center awareness and better facilities would certainly draw in those expecting a more premier league feel to ameneties etc.

2.5k I think is realistic while the product is as good as it is and the ground is what it is. The advantages of bigger crowds are obviously more money in the bank for Alex Newby types when we already have Olly Crankshaw on the books out of action.

53
Altrincham FC First Team / Re: Aldershot
« on: February 14, 2024, 12:07:02 AM »
Aldershot are the epitome of a team that you should never bet on the scorelines for.

54
Altrincham FC First Team / Re: Pitch
« on: February 08, 2024, 02:56:47 PM »
Big disadvantage we have is we do not own the land. Some clubs did and it financed their new home.
I may be wrong on this but my understanding is that, although we don't own the freehold, we do own the lease on the land. Is this not similar to owning a leasehold house or flat? i.e. You pay an annual ground rent to the freeholder (TMBC) but you can still freely sell the leasehold property for only slightly less than it would fetch as a freehold.
There is a sporting covenant on it, so I think it renders the land nearly useless for resale.

55
Altrincham FC First Team / Re: Aldershot Away
« on: February 08, 2024, 11:20:25 AM »
On the telebox, 5:30 ko
They just love making Alty get home at silly times.

56
Altrincham FC First Team / Re: Pitch
« on: February 08, 2024, 11:19:48 AM »
The number might be a little large, but if you notice my suggestion is for a ground share as being part of why Trafford might get on board. While Sale is currently only getting 7k averages they will want to be able to hold more for big games and tbh if you moved them out of a Rugby League town we'd possibly see an increase in in their crowds.

Also, the move from National League to League 1 is short when the team is set up right. Wrexham and/or Notts will go up at the first attempt. Chesterfield will do the same next year, what's to say we won't as well if we go up? If the stars aligned we could be knocking on the championship before we even get past the plans stage.

End of the day though it's time to decide how serious the board is about actually being a league club. Moss Lane is a dinosaur of a ground with nowhere good to sit and watch the game, and very few decent places to stand either. We might be griping about the pitch but half the mainstand miss play in a quarter of the pitch (more if they sit close to the "windows", the standing home fans don't know from week to week where will be available to stand to them. Not to mention away fans and how much money we throw away because we can't host them for ale sales. We could test the water with planning permission for the away end, see it rejected then move on to more hospitable locations... or we can still be here in 10 years wondering why the pop side is only open to halfway because Trafford has found more decrepit bits, and we'll still be wondering why the f**k water comes from beneath us on a moss land.

57
Altrincham FC First Team / Re: Pitch
« on: February 07, 2024, 02:34:52 PM »
We need a bigger solution than just fixing the pitch.

Trafford Council should have been bending over backwards to bring Sale home, now is the time more than ever with a future football league club in the borough.

The new hybrid turfs that are at old Trafford, Wembley etc. can easily handle the rigours of rugby and football.

Time to get serious about a new home. It's already not going to happen overnight.
Do not disagree if a genuine cost / benefit analysis proves to be positive....otherwise, why should Community Tax payers support private sports clubs ?

Who said the Council fund it? They just need to show some willing to make it happen. They have been the core issue with every attempt that has been made by Sale to both stay (Heywood Road development) and to come back (Fletcher Moss Proposal being the most recent)

The idea behind it being a dual-team venue is how it can be funded... There are Billionaire owners at both teams at this point.

We build a 15,000 seat stadium with two on-site training facilities a la Carrington and Edgerton for both teams. They are available for the community each evening and for schools on schedule in the day.

We've no chance of staying at Moss Lane, we had issues getting locals on board for improved floodlights that reduced the light leak onto their houses. Does anyone honestly think they will stand for major stand builds on their doorstep?

To the out-of-town argument, York moved out of town and gained 1500 new fans...

58
Altrincham FC First Team / Re: Pitch
« on: February 06, 2024, 07:23:30 PM »
We need a bigger solution than just fixing the pitch.

Trafford Council should have been bending over backwards to bring Sale home, now is the time more than ever with a future football league club in the borough.

The new hybrid turfs that are at old Trafford, Wembley etc. can easily handle the rigours of rugby and football.

Time to get serious about a new home. It's already not going to happen overnight.

59
Altrincham FC First Team / Re: Dorking (H)
« on: February 06, 2024, 06:17:23 PM »
Terrible comms from the club this. Pretty livid we can't manage expectations better than this.

Probably time to roll someone out to make a statement about the pitch.

60
Altrincham FC First Team / Re: Transfer Window
« on: February 06, 2024, 12:09:11 PM »
Thank you, everyone, for the information.  It happened when my wife was seriously ill and subsequently passed. My mind was not on Altrincham at the time.

One other thing. How do I get the grey background when I insert someone else's text?

Thanks again.
Click quote or use [ quote ] & [ /quote ] without the spaces with the quote filled inbetween.

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 ... 134