By using " the video evidence available" I assume that wont be forthcoming from altrincham until the slanderous comments about alledged racism by our "right wing tory scum" fans on the messageboard that's linked from their official website are removed?
I hope we are using the same video for the challenge on Duncan??
What would we use it for?
I was in the Office and didn't see the challenge but (apparently totally incorrectly) the match officials adjudicated that it was not worthy of a free kick let alone a disciplinary sanction so the video, in this case is absolutely nugatory
A referee will never get anything wrong and there is never anything refered after the game for a second look
why dont you get a cctv fitted in your office so you can make sure the officials are always right?
Get a grip! I've just said that they obviously got it wrong haven't i?
Also, as you will know officials are not always right and nor have I ever said that they are.
Unfortunately when you play at the level we are at then you get a standard of player and official commensurate with that level of football.
You are right that if a Referee becomes aware when viewing a DVD that he has missed something he can retrospectively refer it to the FA. However as DVDs are not mandatory at BSN level (they are in the BSP) I'm not sure whether the facility is available to him on this occasion. Appeals can only be made with the support of video evidence but this would not be an appeal per se in the case of Duncan.
I'm intrigued to know where the reference to Courts has emanated from as well