www.altyfans.co.uk

General Category => Altrincham FC First Team => Topic started by: RocketDan on November 02, 2012, 11:06:05 AM

Title: 2005 vs. 2012
Post by: RocketDan on November 02, 2012, 11:06:05 AM
Following on from another thread. I thought it would be interesting to compare the two teams and see who would get in to the other teams.

This TEAM is nowhere as good as the 2005 TEAM

Eddie, Val, where they in this team? Never say die, this TEAM? Never not even in the same league



1. Stuart COBURN,
2. Steve ASPINALL,
3. Chris ADAMS,
4. Mark MADDOX,
5. Gary TALBOT,
6. Eddie HUSSIN (capt),
7. Colin POTTS,
8. Val OWEN,
9. Colin LITTLE,
10. Rod THORNLEY,
11. Gary SCOTT.


1. Stuart COBURN,
2. Shaun DENSMORE (capt),
3. Matt DOUGHTY,
4. Carl RODGERS,
5. Gianluca HAVERN,
6. Danny HALL,
7. Duncan WATMORE,
8. Jake MOULT,
9. James LAWRIE,
10. Damian REEVES,
11. Nicky CLEE.



Reeves and Clee are the only two definates who would get in the 2005 team.

I'd probably have Watmore, Moult and Densmore also.
Title: Re: 2005 vs. 2012
Post by: temp alty on November 02, 2012, 12:03:39 PM
(http://ct.fra.bz/ol/fz/sw/i54/5/4/17/frabz-does-it-matter-b7b0ef.jpg)
Title: Re: 2005 vs. 2012
Post by: Jenga on November 02, 2012, 12:29:10 PM
I think some of our current players are just as good as 2005.

The question for me and the comparison is the Heart and the Badge.

I hope to see 2012 play with pride, heart and for the badge on Sunday and indeed every other game like the 2005 players did.
Title: Re: 2005 vs. 2012
Post by: alty.fc on November 02, 2012, 03:48:43 PM
Lets get behind them they have got us to the first round proper !! Come on Alty
Title: Re: 2005 vs. 2012
Post by: Timperley The Best on November 02, 2012, 04:36:28 PM
Technically this current team has better players imo
Title: Re: 2005 vs. 2012
Post by: taxi Phil on November 02, 2012, 09:25:55 PM
Technically this current team has better players imo
And the standard of opposition seems generally better than 2005.
Title: Re: 2005 vs. 2012
Post by: Jimmy on November 02, 2012, 09:33:59 PM
Football is technically better at all levels however unless this team gets promoted its hard to argue its case
Title: Re: 2005 vs. 2012
Post by: Timperley The Best on February 10, 2013, 02:09:37 PM
reigniting this one a bit , this isnt a slant on 2oo5 team who were quite good but the current  side is better and would be potentially better equipped if we do go up not to struggle in the bsp
Title: Re: 2005 vs. 2012
Post by: Jimmy on February 10, 2013, 02:38:50 PM
This can only be answerd in may
Title: Re: 2005 vs. 2012
Post by: taxi Phil on February 10, 2013, 04:03:21 PM
This can only be answerd in may
No Jimmy, August/ September IF we make it.
Title: Re: 2005 vs. 2012
Post by: Timperley The Best on February 10, 2013, 04:09:38 PM
This can only be answerd in may
No Jimmy, August/ September IF we make it.

all about opinions but the only 3 i would have in from 2005 would be eddie hussin , colin potts and mark maddox, even colin little would be sub
Title: Re: 2005 vs. 2012
Post by: RocketDan on February 10, 2013, 04:23:34 PM
how good would this team be???

      

                  Coburn

Densmore   Maddox   Havern   Doughty

Watmore     Moult      Hussin     Clee

                    Little     Reeves
Title: Re: 2005 vs. 2012
Post by: Timperley The Best on February 10, 2013, 04:24:35 PM
how good would this team be???

      

                  Coburn

Densmore   Maddox   Havern   Doughty

Watmore     Moult      Hussin     Clee

                    Little     Reeves

would agree with that
Title: Re: 2005 vs. 2012
Post by: taxi Phil on February 10, 2013, 07:26:38 PM
how good would this team be???

      

                  Coburn

Densmore   Maddox   Havern   Doughty

Watmore     Moult      Hussin     Clee

                    Little     Reeves

would agree with that

Owen for Moult.
Title: Re: 2005 vs. 2012
Post by: Timperley The Best on February 10, 2013, 07:30:23 PM
how good would this team be???

      

                  Coburn

Densmore   Maddox   Havern   Doughty

Watmore     Moult      Hussin     Clee

                    Little     Reeves

would agree with that

Owen for Moult.


close one but moult a bit more creative imo
Title: Re: 2005 vs. 2012
Post by: Jimmy on February 10, 2013, 08:14:41 PM
I like moult been a good signing but he is no val Owen most that team looks bout right but I'd have talbot or maybe leather to partner mad dog
Title: Re: 2005 vs. 2012
Post by: Robins Retweet on February 10, 2013, 08:20:02 PM
Current chester side would beat both of them, its so hard to compare though.

but imo the only thing im sure of is we can give guiseley more than enough to think about in the play off final......
Title: Re: 2005 vs. 2012
Post by: Jimmy on February 10, 2013, 08:30:44 PM
To me guiseley looked better than Chester but that's not to say we can't go up
Title: Re: 2005 vs. 2012
Post by: Robins Retweet on February 10, 2013, 08:57:01 PM
To me guiseley looked better than Chester but that's not to say we can't go up

chester were in top gear for like 20 minutes against us, at the time we were'nt anywhere near as organised, and guiseleys best player is holsgrove  :o
Title: Re: 2005 vs. 2012
Post by: markecky on February 10, 2013, 08:58:29 PM
To me guiseley looked better than Chester but that's not to say we can't go up

chester were in top gear for like 20 minutes against us, at the time we were'nt anywhere near as organised, and guiseleys best player is holsgrove  :o

Guiseley were the only team we have played this season who were better than us in my opinion.  That said, so they should be the money they are on and the time they have spent having a go at it year on year.
Title: Re: 2005 vs. 2012
Post by: Beaver on February 10, 2013, 09:07:40 PM
how good would this team be???

      

                  Coburn

Densmore   Maddox   Havern   Doughty

Watmore     Moult      Hussin     Clee

                    Little     Reeves

This.
Title: Re: 2005 vs. 2012
Post by: Robins Retweet on February 10, 2013, 09:12:20 PM
To me guiseley looked better than Chester but that's not to say we can't go up

chester were in top gear for like 20 minutes against us, at the time we were'nt anywhere near as organised, and guiseleys best player is holsgrove  :o

Guiseley were the only team we have played this season who were better than us in my opinion.  That said, so they should be the money they are on and the time they have spent having a go at it year on year.
chester are streets ahead of any team including hyde last season i have seen us play, i dont think ive seen a team kill a game and take their foot off the pedal like they did at moss lane since the bsp.
Title: Re: 2005 vs. 2012
Post by: Jimmy on February 10, 2013, 09:29:01 PM
Statistics say your right mate however guiseley tore us a new arse for. 90 minutes
Title: Re: 2005 vs. 2012
Post by: AltyTunnelSteward on February 11, 2013, 12:12:59 AM
how good would this team be???

      

                  Coburn

Densmore   Maddox   Havern   Doughty

Watmore     Moult      Hussin     Clee

                    Little     Reeves

For me I'd have Rod up front with Reeves. No slight on Colin but he and Reeves are too similar whereas Rod had that extra acceleration to run in behind
Title: Re: 2005 vs. 2012
Post by: Timperley The Best on February 11, 2013, 08:40:51 AM
The latest posts seem to agree that the majority of any hypothetical team would come from the current team which is a fair turn around from the first post which suggested only two of the current sidre would get in to the 2005 team , not that any oif it matters!
Title: Re: 2005 vs. 2012
Post by: AltyTunnelSteward on February 11, 2013, 09:14:19 AM
Now reconsidered

Duncan is clearly a central striker rather than a wide player so I'd have him and Reeves through the middle
Title: Re: 2005 vs. 2012
Post by: Robins Retweet on February 11, 2013, 10:43:26 AM
Statistics say your right mate however guiseley tore us a new arse for. 90 minutes
i know what your saying jimmy but its like saying Southampton are the best side city have played this season  ;)
Title: Re: 2005 vs. 2012
Post by: Leon on February 11, 2013, 10:49:30 AM
The question no-one has addressed is: which Coburn would you pick - the 2005 version or the 2013 one?
Title: Re: 2005 vs. 2012
Post by: Robins Retweet on February 11, 2013, 10:51:58 AM
Now reconsidered

Duncan is clearly a central striker rather than a wide player so I'd have him and Reeves through the middle
for me he drifts in and out of each position and it works perfectly as a foil for reeves,

he drifts so deep and wide and also the good work you see for his goal comes from his wide play and he turned the centre back in the box like a winger with ease, oh and then the finish of a striker! whatever his true position is, what a player he is!

Title: Re: 2005 vs. 2012
Post by: bumble on February 11, 2013, 12:48:01 PM
The question no-one has addressed is: which Coburn would you pick - the 2005 version or the 2013 one?

2005 snack bar food or 2013 snack bar food?

But on a serious note, I'd go with earlier Coburn
Title: Re: 2005 vs. 2012
Post by: TheCultOfIanTunnacliffe on February 11, 2013, 12:58:05 PM

The question no-one has addressed is: which Coburn would you pick - the 2005 version or the 2013 one?



Neither.

It's Richard Acton or Ian Senior from the 2004/05 season for me.....
Title: Re: 2005 vs. 2012
Post by: Jimmy on February 11, 2013, 05:53:48 PM
Statistics say your right mate however guiseley tore us a new arse for. 90 minutes
i know what your saying jimmy but its like saying Southampton are the best side city have played this season  ;)
That would be Dortmund or Madrid jacko
Title: Re: 2005 vs. 2012
Post by: Steve from Sale on February 11, 2013, 09:24:01 PM
Duncan reminds me of the Leopard/Cheetah off the football team from Bednobs and Broomsticks who tears around everywhere setting fire to the opponents tails, and when an opposing player steps on his tail, digs himself into a trench into his own trench.

Then again, that may be the only way of stopping him!!
Title: Re: 2005 vs. 2012
Post by: taxi Phil on February 11, 2013, 10:30:41 PM

The question no-one has addressed is: which Coburn would you pick - the 2005 version or the 2013 one?



Neither.

It's Richard Acton or Ian Senior from the 2004/05 season for me.....
I suppose you want a special dispensation to play Tunna ahead of Reevesy.......