I can see both points of view to some extent. On the one hand, we're in a situation where we can ill afford to lose any ground in what was always going to be a tough return to this league. Therefore, any perceived selection and/or tactical errors are going to be extremely frustrating to us as fans. It is also apparent (and not entirely surprising) that we have players in our squad who, despite their best efforts, are probably not cut out for playing at this level, something which will need to be addressed somehow if we are to prosper in this league. The manager certainly needs to earn his corn there.
On the flip side of that, every defeat/mistake is not necessarily directly Lee Sinnott's fault and the players have to shoulder their share of the blame sometimes too. I think most fair-minded people can see that Lee does make errors sometimes, but the clamour amongst a few people for him to be shown the door every time we have a few bad results is unbalanced, in that a series of good results is not met with equal praise. Surely if the manager is culpable when we lose, then equally he should receive fair praise when we win? It has been proven on this forum numerous times that this does not always happen.
I don't think the guy is perfect by any means and he has his work cut out for him over the coming months. In my opinion, he deserves the chance to turn things around and he should rightly be judged on the merits of that come the end of the season. I do feel, though, that some people have had the knives out for LS since day one, and if him getting us promoted didn't win them over, then nothing probably will.
Let's hope we get things back on track, starting on Saturday!