This will quite likely get some sort of reaction but personally I don't think he should be allowed back into the game
Just an opinion
Why?
Because of what he did. Irrespective of his pleas of innocence, what Beaver says is correct - he did something. Disturbingly he exploited his celebrity to gain sexual gratification at the expense of another and that, for my money, is a total no no (and yes I know others have and continue to do it but that don't make it right)
Would you allow Stuart Hall, Jimmy Saville, Rolf Harris etc to resume their careers with access to people similar to those they were convicted of abusing?
If the review finds that he is innocent of ANY wrongdoing then I'd reconsider.
I know that due to his conviction he would not be able to coach or Referee so I don't really see why he should be allowed to play...maybe once the whole sentence period is expired plus some but i stick to my views