The club website has been updated and now includes the statement
"The formal meeting finally voted on the four resolutions, all of which were passed without any votes against".
That is either an error or deliberate deceit.
An error is an error and is symptomatic of what is going on at the club. This is straightforward counting. Basic stuff.
I wonder what the view of the representative from MLP Law is .
I suspect he thinks the same as me. You're an awkward a**hole with an axe to grind. John Laidlar published the facts, whether he was a private shareholder or not. He was neither deceitful nor made a mistake. Grahame Rowley used the word "unanimous" when "no votes against" was probably the correct term. Bill Waterson does not need to apologise for John Laidlar.
As for the "Postal vote" there was no such thing. There was a proxy vote whereby you could nominate the Chairman or someone else who would attend the meeting on your behalf to vote for you. As I assume you allowed Grahame Rowley to vote on your behalf, as seemingly did all the other proxy voters, then he and MLP Law knew full well how those votes were cast, and therefore how the votes cast in the room affected the total vote.
If anything is "symptomatic" it's your post trying to pick faults in everything associated with Altrincham Football Club. Get a life and grow up.