www.altyfans.co.uk

General Category => Altrincham FC First Team => Topic started by: Mrs Warbouys on May 27, 2016, 06:37:24 PM

Title: Clee to guisley
Post by: Mrs Warbouys on May 27, 2016, 06:37:24 PM
According to Twitter
Title: Re: Clee to guisley
Post by: Mrs Warbouys on May 27, 2016, 06:39:15 PM
Interview here
Title: Re: Clee to guisley
Post by: TheCultOfIanTunnacliffe on May 27, 2016, 06:41:48 PM


Guiseley have announced the signing of versatile winger Nicky Clee and the contract renewal of young forward Luke Porritt as preparations for a second National League campaign step up a gear.

Clee, 32, follows Michael Rankine to Nethermoor from Altrincham where he spent seven successful years and became a fans’ favourite during his time at Moss Lane.

Known to be a skilful winger with an eye for goal, Lions boss Mark Bower said; “Nicky has come to us on an appearance based deal and turned down more security elsewhere for the chance to prove himself with us at National League level.

He’s a very gifted footballer with a great left foot and can play in numerous positions. We’re pleased Nicky has decided to join us and we feel he will be a real asset to the team for the coming season.”


http://guiseleyafc.co.uk/first-team-news/lions-secure-two-more/ (http://guiseleyafc.co.uk/first-team-news/lions-secure-two-more/)
Title: Re: Clee to guisley
Post by: TheCultOfIanTunnacliffe on May 27, 2016, 06:43:42 PM
Interview here


You supply the cross and I'll head the ball into the onion bag!


https://audioboom.com/boos/4623716-nicky-clee-delighted-to-become-a-lion-after-joining-guiseley  (https://audioboom.com/boos/4623716-nicky-clee-delighted-to-become-a-lion-after-joining-guiseley)
Title: Re: Clee to guisley
Post by: Mrs Warbouys on May 27, 2016, 06:49:36 PM
Ha!
Title: Re: Clee to guisley
Post by: PukkaPieman on May 27, 2016, 07:15:20 PM
Really sad but glad he's gone to Guiseley and not a Conf North team.

I wish you all the best for the future Nick.
Title: Re: Clee to guisley
Post by: andrewflynn on May 27, 2016, 07:18:29 PM
Can play in numerous positions? Debatable.

All the best Nicky. In my eyes an Altrincham hero and I hope he has a great season with them.
Title: Re: Clee to guisley
Post by: Ballers on May 27, 2016, 07:29:23 PM
Can play in numerous positions? Debatable.

All the best Nicky. In my eyes an Altrincham hero and I hope he has a great season with them.

I think left back and left wing back he certainly can and he ripped Chester to pieces from the right flank the other season.

If anyone knows why that formation with him and Crowther was never played again after beating Chester 4-1 do let me know...

Anyway, it's a real good move for Nicky and I hope he does well. Let's be clear, unlike others there's a lad who owes us absolutely nothing! Good luck Nicky.

And whilst I'm happy with the two young wingers we've got I'd feel a lot better if we picked up Rothery or Boshell (N) as well.
Title: Re: Clee to guisley
Post by: oneedham on May 27, 2016, 09:56:17 PM
Just was the best winger since Showler, shame we couldn't just see how his pre season went and maybe offered him a pay as you play wage. He still has all the ability but fair play that Young has cleared out all our sick notes. Just maybe would have given Clee a chance.
Title: Re: Clee to guisley
Post by: VofD on May 27, 2016, 10:24:38 PM
Didn't he also play in goal at some stage,IIRC.
Title: Re: Clee to guisley
Post by: ManagementGuru on May 27, 2016, 11:24:21 PM
Yep replaced Stuart at Dover on Stu's last appearance for us
Title: Re: Clee to guisley
Post by: taxi Phil on May 28, 2016, 12:19:00 AM
Yep replaced Stuart at Dover on Stu's last appearance for us
England's, England's number eleven......
Title: Re: Clee to guisley
Post by: chesteralty on May 28, 2016, 08:49:40 AM
Should have kept him.
We pay money to keep him while he's recuperating, then when he recovers we get rid! Ridiculous.
If he only plays half a season he would have been worth keeping. Best player we've had here in years!!
Title: Re: Clee to guisley
Post by: JTH on May 28, 2016, 10:34:45 AM
Big call by NY releasing Nicky, but as has been discussed previously no-one knows his injury issues more than our back room team. A fit Clee is a class act and if a regular last season would've seen us stay up - comfortably.
Title: Re: Clee to guisley
Post by: Frosty on May 28, 2016, 11:07:01 AM
Lets stop looking back and start looking to the future
Title: Re: Clee to guisley
Post by: Bob on May 28, 2016, 11:20:42 AM
As soon as a player is valuable to us "when fit" then the question marks start to appear.

A good player and servant to us but time to say thanks and look forward.
Title: Re: Clee to guisley
Post by: Mick on May 28, 2016, 12:27:26 PM
Agree
I wish Nicky all the best at Guiseley..............but who's to say he won't sap their budget and they only get 9 games from him?
Title: Re: Clee to guisley
Post by: chesteralty on May 28, 2016, 12:43:59 PM
He's being paid on an appearance basis
Why couldn't we do that?
Title: Re: Clee to guisley
Post by: Mausoleum Alty on May 28, 2016, 01:33:32 PM
He's being paid on an appearance basis
Why couldn't we do that?

To pay someone on an appearance basis you still have to count it in your playing budget. If we'd kept Nicky it would have meant less money to offer other players which is all well and good if he was to play the majority of games but if he missed the majority we'd have less players in the squad to cover because we still would've had to keep money aside in case he did play games if that makes sense.
Title: Re: Clee to guisley
Post by: GolfRoader on May 28, 2016, 01:56:55 PM
He's being paid on an appearance basis
Why couldn't we do that?

To pay someone on an appearance basis you still have to count it in your playing budget. If we'd kept Nicky it would have meant less money to offer other players which is all well and good if he was to play the majority of games but if he missed the majority we'd have less players in the squad to cover because we still would've had to keep money aside in case he did play games if that makes sense.

Think he'd have been worth it though, especially in the Conf north.
Title: Re: Clee to guisley
Post by: GB Alty on May 28, 2016, 02:01:33 PM
He's being paid on an appearance basis
Why couldn't we do that?
think Young has made it pretty clear he wants young fit players
Title: Re: Clee to guisley
Post by: SW on May 28, 2016, 06:20:40 PM
Sometimes it is hard to say goodbye. But you have to. The team is always bigger, some big losses this time but the time is right to rebuild. Thanks to all moving on, you were part of us.
Title: Re: Clee to guisley
Post by: Timperley The Best on May 28, 2016, 07:09:39 PM
Cant look back now Nicky is almost 33 and had an injury for most of last season , think he will do well at Guiseley though
Title: Re: Clee to guisley
Post by: Frosty on May 28, 2016, 07:58:06 PM
Yawn
Title: Re: Clee to guisley
Post by: Mrs Warbouys on May 28, 2016, 09:00:10 PM
Bring on the alty
Title: Re: Clee to guisley
Post by: VofD on May 28, 2016, 10:52:04 PM
He's being paid on an appearance basis
Why couldn't we do that?
think Young has made it pretty clear he wants young fit players

Fine, but remember : " young fit players " can also suffer serious injuries at any time. Hopefully, it will not happen to us next season.

IMO, I'm not overwhelmed by the majority of signings so far. Hopefully, things will improve.
Title: Re: Clee to guisley
Post by: GB Alty on May 29, 2016, 01:20:37 PM
He's being paid on an appearance basis
Why couldn't we do that?
think Young has made it pretty clear he wants young fit players

Fine, but remember : " young fit players " can also suffer serious injuries at any time. Hopefully, it will not happen to us next season.

IMO, I'm not overwhelmed by the majority of signings so far. Hopefully, things will improve.
what do you expect?

Where do you think were at now?

This is the reality of relegation
Title: Re: Clee to guisley
Post by: Timperley The Best on May 29, 2016, 01:35:09 PM
a couple of well know  names still expected as well as youngsters?
Title: Re: Clee to guisley
Post by: taxi Phil on May 29, 2016, 01:43:58 PM
We'd better work on a version of "The Young Ones" before hostilities begin in earnest.
Title: Re: Clee to guisley
Post by: distancetraveller on May 29, 2016, 02:01:38 PM
I'm surprised the club advertised for a manager, some of the comments on here lead me to believe we have a few potential managers on this forum.
Talk about a poisoned chalice. If we don't win our first two pre season friendlies I can see folks calling for NY's  head.
Title: Re: Clee to guisley
Post by: Jimmy on May 29, 2016, 02:26:34 PM
It's a football forum, the people who go on should talk like potential managers,as for Young I'm sure he will do a fine job and out of all the players he has got rid off Clee and Marshall are the only 2 I'd question
Title: Re: Clee to guisley
Post by: GB Alty on May 29, 2016, 02:27:54 PM
I'm surprised the club advertised for a manager, some of the comments on here lead me to believe we have a few potential managers on this forum.
Talk about a poisoned chalice. If we don't win our first two pre season friendlies I can see folks calling for NY's  head.
some people still holding a candle for the Sinnott/Tolson regime unfortunately, they won't support the new regime, sad really. It's that backwards thinking that got us relegated in the first place

I am backing Young 100%
Title: Re: Clee to guisley
Post by: Bob on May 29, 2016, 03:46:36 PM
I'm surprised the club advertised for a manager, some of the comments on here lead me to believe we have a few potential managers on this forum.
Talk about a poisoned chalice. If we don't win our first two pre season friendlies I can see folks calling for NY's  head.
some people still holding a candle for the Sinnott/Tolson regime unfortunately, they won't support the new regime, sad really. It's that backwards thinking that got us relegated in the first place

I am backing Young 100%

To be fair, the person "not overwhelmed by the majority of signings so far" was hardly president of the Lee Sinnott fan club.

The other criticisms have been of a fans favourite not being kept on. We don't like change here as has been said but I doubt loyalty to Sinnott has anything to do with it. He's finished now. Gone. Not coming back.
Title: Re: Clee to guisley
Post by: SW on May 29, 2016, 04:22:46 PM
What I see happening right now at the club I have supported since 1971 is as refreshing as I have ever seen, we were at almost the lowest ebb I can recall apart from the Les Rigby tenure. We are moving into a new era, if it doesn't work then nobody can say we didn't try. Fully behind the new regime, lets all get behind them too.
Title: Re: Clee to guisley
Post by: MarpleAlty on May 29, 2016, 08:13:15 PM
It's a football forum, the people who go on should talk like potential managers,as for Young I'm sure he will do a fine job and out of all the players he has got rid off Clee and Marshall are the only 2 I'd question

I don't get this obsession with Clee, to be honest. Yes he's been great in the past, but absolutely correct decision to release him
Title: Re: Clee to guisley
Post by: Jezza on May 30, 2016, 08:44:36 AM
I hope this move works out for Nicky.

I think it shows what a genuine decent bloke he is turning down other secure offers and taking a sort of pay per play opportunity rather than signing a contract and stealing money for not playing like we were victim of with Griffith last season.

He owes us nothing and goes with very best wishes and thanks for many happy memories.

I wonder if we offered him anything similar?

he signed for guisley
nicky nicky clee....
Title: Re: Clee to guisley
Post by: Ballers on May 30, 2016, 09:13:09 AM
It's a football forum, the people who go on should talk like potential managers,as for Young I'm sure he will do a fine job and out of all the players he has got rid off Clee and Marshall are the only 2 I'd question

I don't get this obsession with Clee, to be honest. Yes he's been great in the past, but absolutely correct decision to release him

I think when all is said and done, every single player released had a question mark against them, be it injury, fitness, value for money, (unfortunately), lack of form/interest/ability.

I loved Nicky Clee. Masha and Tim Deasy excellent too but if we'd kept them on and they had injury problems it would absolutely screw us.

I'm happy with the signings thus far but would like to see 2 or 3 experienced players to complement the young hungry players. You wouldn't want 15 young lads from the lower leagues. Although Hyde romped the league with that Curzon team.

Hennagan, Moult and Reeves gives us a bit of a spine though.
Title: Re: Clee to guisley
Post by: Steve from Sale on May 30, 2016, 10:53:49 AM
Don't forget we also have Shaun Densmore as well; he fits into that category.
Title: Re: Clee to guisley
Post by: MarpleAlty on May 30, 2016, 10:54:26 AM
It's a football forum, the people who go on should talk like potential managers,as for Young I'm sure he will do a fine job and out of all the players he has got rid off Clee and Marshall are the only 2 I'd question

I don't get this obsession with Clee, to be honest. Yes he's been great in the past, but absolutely correct decision to release him

I think when all is said and done, every single player released had a question mark against them, be it injury, fitness, value for money, (unfortunately), lack of form/interest/ability.

I loved Nicky Clee. Masha and Tim Deasy excellent too but if we'd kept them on and they had injury problems it would absolutely screw us.

I'm happy with the signings thus far but would like to see 2 or 3 experienced players to complement the young hungry players. You wouldn't want 15 young lads from the lower leagues. Although Hyde romped the league with that Curzon team.

Hennagan, Moult and Reeves gives us a bit of a spine though.

There are plenty of lads out there, in their early 30's, looking beyond their immediate football careers. The knack is picking the right ones. For every Colin Little there is a Twiss / Griffith.

I hope we aren't put off the idea of adding 1 or 2 experienced heads in this way - a Cav type player would have saved us last year.
Title: Re: Clee to guisley
Post by: Macsporran on May 30, 2016, 11:44:03 AM
Don't forget we also have Shaun Densmore as well; he fits into that category.
Good shout Steve, will be great to have a fit Dens back ( hopefully )
Title: Re: Clee to guisley
Post by: TheCultOfIanTunnacliffe on May 30, 2016, 01:31:04 PM


Don't forget we also have Shaun Densmore as well; he fits into that category.


Good shout Steve, will be great to have a fit Dens back ( hopefully )



It's purely a hypothetical question but would Densmore have survived Neil Young's overhaul of the playing squad if he had not been under contract for another season?

He actually made fewer appearances than Clee last season.


Title: Re: Clee to guisley
Post by: robininstockport on May 30, 2016, 01:52:45 PM
Personally I think he'd have binned all four off
Title: Re: Clee to guisley
Post by: taxi Phil on May 30, 2016, 04:28:16 PM
Indeed. Richman was bedevilled by niggling injuries last season and I think the contract saved him. If he's fully fit for the new season he'll be an asset at this level.
Title: Re: Clee to guisley
Post by: Leon on May 30, 2016, 04:48:36 PM
NY mentioned Moult positively in his first interview as manager, so he may have offered him a new deal, I think. And Heathcote surely fits the player profile he's after and won't be on much money. Densmore and Richman are interesting ones. It's Simon who may have the more convincing to do, given the new signings. It'll also be interesting to see who captains the side - Densmore, Moult or someone else.