1) 'The experimental gene therapy drugs don't stop transmission....'
2) 'Latest data suggests that they don't make much difference to hospitalisations and deaths'
3) '...and quite a lot of people have died from them...'
Either provide links to the peer reviewed sources you are quoting, or stop posting crank conspiracy nonsense; it's embarrassing frankly.
Same goes for someone suggesting the club should get involved with the "vaccine" coercion. Why is it a different standard for me? Twit.
In the mean time, if you're really interested, I provide the following link to be going on with, which links to a page on "vaccine" adverse reactions and deaths based on MHRA Yellow Card Covid-19 adverse reaction data (i.e. official government data) - information you are unlikely to see mentioned on your BBC.
https://yellowcard.ukcolumn.org/yellow-card-reports
I emphasise, people can make their own health decisions, and it's not an issue the club should get involved with (as someone else appeared to suggest they should - the reason I posted in the first place).
Jeremy Vine got very uppioty when someone managed to get onto his show highlighting this information.
The caller lied to get on - saying how he changed his mind after originally being anti vaccine - and, when accused of lying, pointed out that is what the BBC have been doing.
If we truly are an inclusive club, we should let anyone in reegardless of their medical history.
Some excellent point again Hugh, speaking as someone who has had his double jab.