Firstly, I'm loving the amount of people who haven’t been duped by the politicians and media on this one.
There is no logic in the idea that Palins views add any weight to the argument either way..But if youwere to go down this route, the other side is pushed by Al (I invented the internet) Gore and other establishment politicians and the mainstream media (you know those people who lie and manipulate truths on a daily basis). Then you've got David Rothschild prating about on a boat made of lynx cans or something, to promote man made global warming whilst the rest of his filthy family and their crony’s push for carbon taxes and global government. But I’m sure this is just a coincidence.
Finally, and in response to the statement that “I would be surprised if anyone could name any scientific body of any standing that does not agree with this”. There are a number of scientists who disagree, they may be the minority but numbers do not decide if a theory is right or wrong. Having looked at both sides of the argument for me it basically comes to one side with a theory and lots of fancy models which are potentially highly inaccurate and based on assumption upon assumption. And the other who bases its opinion on scientifically undisputed facts that you would learn in an introductory geology lesson and comon sense.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_scientists_opposing_the_mainstream_scientific_assessment_of_global_warmingI know it may sound a little wacky to some of you, but governments and the media manipulate people, and the big yellow thing in the sky is what determines whether it is hot or cold, not deodorants and cow farts.