And for my part, I think you've been all over the place with some of your comments (and lacking in empathy). It's just an opinion about Digie. Since when did someone have to be an expert to have one? Maybe I will have to make detailed notes...
Well, at least that way it would enable you to recall all of Digie's blunders and save you from posting a ludicrously inaccurate panegyric about his performance!
Look, it was just a gut reaction based on what I saw of his second half performance. I was still eating my food when the second goal scored so didn't see it properly. I missed the second mistake for some reason - maybe I mixed him up with Bercoe who I think had been playing some of the game in that position.
For the sake of argument, let's say he does make too many mistakes, that he is awkward on the ball and never going to learn. It brings us back to why management brought him in and played him. My theory would be something like this: they were short of players, it is difficult to persuade a team to release one of their best players during the season so they thought they would take a gamble on Digie and see if they could make something of him (and it sounded like Parky pretty much said that in the interview), and knowing that he might be exposed against the likes of County but believing he could do a job at least against the lesser teams. They would have a go at improving him and see where they were at the end of the season. Could it have been something like this, and if Digie is not good enough, how hard would it be to find someone who was significantly better?