I wonder if the original post of this thread has been lost somewhat, surely its intention was to gain a report from people who were there on the floor of AGM? I would imagine that a fair percentage of users of this forum are either non-shareholders or the ones that are shareholders may be exiles.
I certainly mean no disrespect to John Laidlar in saying this, but any report on the clubs official website is surely only going to paint a kind picture of the board and present the events of the AGM in a positive light?
Therefore perhaps any attendees who use this forum could confirm that the official report is indeed a fair reflection or in fact confirm any contentious issues not mentioned in John's report? For example when it came to the vote on Grahame Rowley's re-election as chairman were there any dissenting voices or votes against re-election? Whilst I would be surprised if there were enough voices present to ensure that GR lost any vote, I'd certainly be surprised if he was elected unanimously.
Again, I don't think these are unfair questions but can also see why they wouldn't be reported on the official website.
Finally, on the point of personal abuse, the only 'abuse' I have encountered on this thread has come from a club official, shame on you Phil Taylor.