www.altyfans.co.uk

And it looks like it could be our turn next week (if I know group think).

I think I'll hold off buying tickets for Wrexham and Stockport until next Monday (if there's any left by then).

What a mess!

The latest Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) Yellow Card data suggests that one in 128 people have experienced an adverse event related to the mRNA "Covid vaccine". Latest fatalities are reported as 1,822. 1,314,659 adverse events have been reported.
The MHRA have previously estimated that the Yellow Card reporting rate may be about 10% of actual figures (see here https://www.gov.uk/drug-safety-update/yellow-card-please-help-to-reverse-the-decline-in-reporting-of-suspected-adverse-drug-reactions), however whether this under-reporting figure still applies in this context, and whether it applies to deaths (perhaps less likely) as well as mere adverse events is not clear - though anecdotally, it seems some people who suffer reactions are not informed of the Yellow Card system.. Reports can be filled in by individuals affected, but the vast majority are said to be filled in by medical professionals, and the MHRA do have the power to remove reports. Giving false information is a criminal offence.

The equivalent figures for the USA reported by VAERS are 946,463 adverse event reports, including 19,886 deaths and 150,946 serious injuries. I do not know why the fatality rate appears to be higher under the VAERS reporting system

N.B. At the Plymouth Argyle game yesterday, supporters were asked by stewards to show "Covid" passes before being allowed to see the game. I suspect that similar incidents may happen at some non-league games (unless all affected clubs do a "Carlisle United"). As long as this remains the case, this subject will remain a point of legitimate interest and discussion on here.

I should also say that, as with other medical procedures where a degree of coercion can be involved, I very much expect there to be an issue of (lack of) free and informed consent. If people going for this mRNA "vaccine" have been told nothing more than "100% safe and effective" (and I don't know how much this does happen), then that is not acceptable, and may constitute a criminal offence if recipients have not been adequately informed.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/boris-johnson-omicron-government-financial-times-prime-minister-b1978488.html

Looks like our festive football could be ruined again and that eve if (at least) some of us can go to matches, we may not be allowed in the CSH (for all the good it will do).

Presumably the club are making contingency plans?

https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinion/toxic-spike-proteins-made-by-covid-jabs-often-cause-permanent-damage-in-kids-mrna-inventor/

Dr. Robert Malone, quoted in this link, is not "anti-vax". I had little interest in the matter before the rushed development, emergency approval and coercion relating to the controversial new "vaccines" for a coronavirus (and a coronavirus vaccine had never previously been successfully brought to market despite repeated attempts). However, I do think it is important that people should be fully informed about the possible risks/benefits. After all, it is illegal to prescribe medication without free and informed consent. There is no shortage of people saying how great these things are, even asserting the distortion (at best,) that they are "100% safe". So I feel it is important to provide a bit of balance.

And maybe to matches involving Notts County, Stockport, Wrexham...

A shameful day. "But it's only apartheid". Get stuffed. Just get stuffed. When's this rubbish going  to end?

And heaven help the NHS, now that tens of thousands of workers face being forced out.

I've no idea if he had had the new medication for a coronavirus that some people are being pressured to have. I hope not - it sounds like it might have been risky with his medical history: he had been taking "medication to treat a rare cavernoma - a cluster of abnormal blood vessels, usually found in the brain and spinal cord which causes seizures, strokes and, in the worst cases, premature deaths".

He had previously collapsed while training with Plymouth, so it could be just one of those things. Still, I would urge anyone with these types of condition to think very carefully about what medications they have, and not least if they are controversial new medications.

Well, another collapse in just a few weeks (and in addition to the death of the former Axminster Town player Adam Bounds, aged 41, recently confirmed as "vaccine induced" (though he actually died in May)). At some point, I may look through my old Non League Papers for similar stories of collapses and see just how much of a "not a trend" this is. From what I can remember (and I could be wrong), whilst there were reports from time to time of someone relatively young dying, I think it was mostly people who were already seriously ill with some longstanding condition such as cancer.  If it's not a trend, and if the coercion and restrictions (including those affecting this football club) stop now as this coronavirus becomes endemic and amidst doubts over whether all-cause mortality is actually reduced by the medications currently being used under emergency authorisation, it could be that there will be nothing more for me to write about anyway in the coming weeks and months on this subject - we'll see.

The Wigan Athletic statement you mean (that they released because quite a lot of people were asking the same question - it wouldn't have been an issue in previous years)? The word "unvaccinated" has been used to mean someone who is not at least 14 days after a second dose (and in fact the government has been fiddling the figures doing something like this, counting people who die within 14 days of this "vaccination" - and during which time immunity is apparently lowered -  as an unvaccinated death - and in fact, taking such things into account, a professor has recently concluded there is no evidence these "vaccines" reduce all-cause mortality). A source with connections to a Premier League club reports that there is a belief among players at that club that this is what happened with Eriksen - that he had had at least one of these doses not long before his collapse, but could technically be described as "unvaccinated" as I described. So far as I am aware, such a scenario has never been denied, though I obviously don't know the specifics of the Wigan case beyond what the club have claimed.

I don't know the ins and outs of every case (though the death of a former Axminster Town player aged 38 was recently reported as being definitely linked to this controversial medication) but there are real issues here, and wishing it weren't so won't change that. What we do know is that (certainly up to recently) no healthy 15-17 year old had died from "covid" - which means that risks from a covid "vaccine", even if low, are more of an issue. Of course there are risks, as with any medication, and not least with this experimental new one being used under emergency authorisation - people might be a bit more trusting of it if the pharmaceutical companies flogging it weren't exempt from liability. History also teaches us that sometimes, a risk may only become apparent after a number of years. You say wait before claiming a trend - by the same token, I say wait before claiming that medication - THIS medication - is safe long term - and some worrying things have come out about Pfizer recently and their emergency authorisation to sell this medication in America.

This "non-trend" could be a combination of things but this year at any rate is looking bad. And it has also been suggested that the unvaccinated could be affected by spike protein shed from the "vaccinated".

Look, I'm not interested in name calling and conspiracy theories about Russia (or whatever). You accept I suppose that there are more of these cases than usual this year at any rate? And significantly more than any other year recently. Why is this? And when does it become a trend? 2 years? 3 years? You previously said that 2 cases don't mean anything, but it turned out there were 4 cases that week alone, and two the next week. Anyone would think that you don't want there to be an actual trend. And I can see from your comment on the first team forum what you're like about these issues sometimes (re. stewarding etc.). Just make a joke about it when people have genuine concerns. Well that's your prerogative, I guess. But it's not scientific. There has never been a coronavirus vaccine successfully brought to market before the current emergency authorisation - that's the issue.

And I'll tell you one thing I do know about the corrupt pharmaceutical industry that you seem to have a high opinion of. The EU has banned my favourite food from being sold as a food. I've been eating it for years in significant quantities without taking any harm. I read years before this ban that the pharmaceutical industry had been putting pressure on various governments to get this food banned. Questions? Dead right I'll ask questions, and I don't see why I shouldn't ask questions when the government is mucking our club about, banning a load of players over some spurious test for a bug with a 0.1% fatality rate (and much less than that among healthy young men), and threatening to ban a section of the population from some matches in an unwelcome return of apartheid, whilst you seem incapable of understanding that such things might be an issue for some people. Questioning and debating, as opposed to closing down free speech, is how we learn things. Maybe I should just think stuff and not debate it with anyone to try and see if what I might think is likely to be right or wrong? And maybe you should never have to come into contact with views you disagree with?

 I'm not revealing all my sources in this new era of human rights abuses, but I don't think that you've proven by any means that whatever sources you rely on are more reliable.

P.S. I don't see the issue with my putting some stuff on the OT forum, it's not like anyone else uses it when I don't.