If you don't want to get your posts deleted play the "argument" rather than the man. I try to get my point on here without being disrespectful to anyone.
I am bemused by the idea that anyone can get behind the team but not the chairman. Who appointed the manager that signed the players? As far as I can see Phil is going to do good things with this squad and as time goes on your stance is going to look out on a limb. I know he AND the board have made some decisions that didn't play out as they expected but so have I. My wife isn't filing for divorce just yet. I agree with the view that Grahame Rowley has no intention of stepping down. Nor would I.
Regarding trouble at the ground I missed the Barwell game but wasn't it Leicester fans that caused the trouble? I like the idea of not needing to segregate the fans. It is a relatively recent phenomena. Football managed without segregation for eighty years and no other sport needs it. Shame on us.
I think it was fairly clear from the GR's programme notes etc. that, left to his own devices, he would have appointed Matt Doughty. I believe it was the influence of the new board members that forced a genuine interview process on him.
Phil Parkinson does appear to be a good appointment. But that doesn't alter my view that GR is a disaster of a chairman and him stepping down is vital for the long-term interests of the football club. You can of course disagree with that but I can't see any logical difficulty in that position.
And managing to blame 'us' for the behaviour of drunk Stafford and Leicester fans is quite some leap.