If we replace Maidstone with either Weymouth or Dover, we are 4 points worse off than the equivalent games last year. So not catastrophic, but not ideal.
The biggest issue I have is with some of the seeming incoherence of the season so far. Clearly this was always going to be an experiment, as we haven't been full-time before, Phil and Neil hadn't managed a full-time squad, etc. And if the experiment was to run with a smallish squad of young hungry players (as was suggested) then fine. But the post-match interview suggested that this might not be the way forward, despite Parky saying this was the first performance he was disappointed in so far this season. If that's the case, then why make the suggestion of bringing in older, more experienced heads and making decisions about the younger players?
I just hope that there hasn't been a loss of conviction or coherence in the transition to full-time. It doesn't really feel like there is an answer to the question 'what sort of a team are we?', beyond the idea that we have loads of possession, and that's a bit at odds with the drive for people to invest in a journey (capital at risk). It'll be really interesting to see whether he sticks or twists, and if he does twist, how late he leaves it.