For me, Jimmy Hill has it spot on.
You can say we went down because we didn't have enough points.
However you can say that the some of the matches were loaded from the start. Would we have beaten Crawley 1-0 and not drawn 1-1 if they had been forced to cut their cloth and play a team of reserves and kids? Or use injured players on the bench to make up numbers like we had to.
Our reward for financial prudence, community work, facilities development and paying bills was relegation as teams who did none of the above stayed happily in the league. What incentive is there to run your club right?
It seems that if your business plan is to survive you cannot do it fairly if not everyone has read the rules of the game.
Its like the kid that goes home for his tea during a game of kickstone comes back out and saves all. Not only have you spent twenty minutes looking for him when he is in his kitchen, you have to be on again and there its always in the back of your mind he may have done it again, despite what his Mum says when you knock on for him.
Yeah Stafford scraped it by having a good start but they were God awful on both times they beat us (yeah yeah Stafford fans, we know we were sh*t as well).
It just doesn't seem right that four quite well run clubs go down and get laughed at by charlatans who make no provision for even paying wages.