Monsieur,
Thanks for your speedy response. I agree with you that such a procedure would be necessary and therefore needs to be defined.
With regards to your other point, we are actively working to improve the home fan match day experience and hopefully some evidence of this was provided by Non League Day.
I accept fully your point re the lateness of this statement and apologise for that
Bill
The statement is poor, it nowhere near addresses what went wrong and doesn't even acknowledge the board got it wrong with the Coaville farce.
Also an apology for compromising fans safety should have been a minimum requirement - yet there is nothing of the sort. The only apology is for the lateness of the statement itself which is ridiculous
This statement treats the supporters with disdain, I'm surprised the SLO's have supported it
If you genuinely believe that Jamie, then nothing I say will make you change your mind.
It's amusing that you seem to have an issue with how I act as an SLO, but haven't spoken to me, messaged me or emailed me to put forward your point of view.
You have a clear lack of understanding of the role (as does the majority of the board at the minute), but as this is a Supporters Direct and Football Supporters Federation initiative, I am receiving support from them.
This was not a club idea, and my role is to be communicative, not a firefighter.
I will pressure the club into listening to the fans, and until things change I will make it as uncomfortable as possible for those that choose not to listen, as was evidenced by my hour long discussion with the chairman after the recent Nantwich game.
Communicaion doesn't mean agreement, so please don't mistake me for a Rowley apologiser.